Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33588915›Full record

Observational studyJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2021

Surgical drainage after limb salvage surgery and endoprosthetic reconstruction: is 30 mL/day critical?

Jiayong Liu, Zhengfu Fan, Marc El Beaino, Valerae O Lewis, Bryan S Moon, Robert L Satcher, Justin E Bird, Spencer J Frink, Patrick P Lin

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jiayong Liu *Present address: Department of Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China.
Zhengfu Fan *Present address: Department of Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China.
Marc El BeainoPresent address: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, State University of New York, Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4990-3334
Valerae O LewisDepartment of Orthopedic Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Bryan S MoonDepartment of Orthopedic Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Robert L SatcherDepartment of Orthopedic Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Justin E BirdDepartment of Orthopedic Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Spencer J FrinkDepartment of Orthopedic Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Patrick P LinDepartment of Orthopedic Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. plin@mdanderson.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1460-4994
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USPeking University · CNState University of New York · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeriprosthetic infection is a major cause of failure after segmental endoprosthetic reconstruction. The purpose of this study is to determine whether certain aspects of drain output affect infection risk, particularly the 30 mL/day criterion for removal.

methodsTwo hundred and ninety-five patients underwent segmental bone resection and lower limb endoprosthetic reconstruction at one institution. Data on surgical drain management and occurrence of infection were obtained from a retrospective review of patients' charts and radiographs. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with infection.

resultsThirty-one of 295 patients (10.5%) developed infection at a median time of 13 months (range 1-108 months). Staphylococcus aureus was the most common organism and was responsible for the majority of cases developing within 1 year of surgery. Mean output at the time of drain removal was 72 mL/day. Ten of 88 patients (11.3%) with ≤ 30 mL/day drainage and 21 of 207 patients (10.1%) with > 30 mL/day drainage developed infection (p = 0.84). In multivariate analysis, independent predictive factors for infection included sarcoma diagnosis (HR 4.13, 95% CI 1.4-12.2, p = 0.01) and preoperative chemotherapy (HR 3.29, 95% CI 1.1-9.6, p = 0.03).

conclusionWaiting until drain output is < 30 mL/day before drain removal is not associated with decreased risk of infection for segmental endoprostheses of the lower limb after tumor resection. Sarcoma diagnosis and preoperative chemotherapy were independent predictors of infection.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildDrainageFemaleHumansLimb SalvageLower ExtremityMaleMiddle AgedOsteonecrosisPlastic Surgery ProceduresPostoperative ComplicationsProstheses and ImplantsBone resectionPeriprosthetic infectionSarcomaSurgical drain

Identifiers

PMID33588915
PMCPMC7883436
OpenAlexW3129953841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.