Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33588893›Full record

Trial reportCritical care (London, England)2021

Impact of treating iron deficiency, diagnosed according to hepcidin quantification, on outcomes after a prolonged ICU stay compared to standard care: a multicenter, randomized, single-blinded trial.

Sigismond Lasocki, Pierre Asfar, Samir Jaber, Martine Ferrandiere, Thomas Kerforne, Karim Asehnoune, Philippe Montravers, Philippe Seguin, Katell Peoc'h, Soizic Gergaud and 4 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Critical care (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02276690 (Medical Economic Analysis of the Interest of Hepcidin Quantitation by Quantitative Mass Spectrometry for the Diagnosis of Iron Deficiency in Anemic Critically Ill Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02276690 nacompletednot on this map

Medical Economic Analysis of the Interest of Hepcidin Quantitation by Quantitative Mass Spectrometry for the Diagnosis of Iron Deficiency in Anemic Critically Ill Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, MontpellierRan2014 to 2017Enrolled408ConditionsAnemia, Critical Illness, Hospitalized for 5 Days or MoreArmshepcidin, ferritin and transferrin saturation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Diagnostics: Markers of Body Iron Status.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  9. What do we know about micronutrients in critically ill patients? A narrative review.JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition · 2025
    Review
  10. Postoperative anemia: is there a role for iron replacement therapy?Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Patient blood management in the ICU: A narrative review of the literature.European journal of anaesthesiology and intensive care · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Sigismond LasockiDépartement Anesthésie Réanimation, CHU Angers, Université D'Angers, 4 rue Larrey, 49933, Angers Cedex 9, France. sigismond@lasocki.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2901-4628
Pierre AsfarDépartement Médecine Intensive Réanimation, CHU Angers, Université D'Angers, Angers, France.
Samir JaberDépartement Anesthésie Réanimation, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Martine FerrandiereDépartement Anesthésie Réanimation, CHU de Tours, Université de Tours, Tours, France.
Thomas KerforneService D'anesthésie-réanimation, CHU de Poitiers, Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Karim AsehnouneDépartement Anesthésie Réanimation, CHU de Nantes, Université de Nantes, Nantes, France.
Philippe MontraversDépartement Anesthésie Réanimation, APHP, HUPNSV, CHU Bichat, Université Paris Diderot Sorbonne, Paris, France.
Philippe SeguinDépartement Anesthésie Réanimation, CHU de Rennes, Université de Rennes, Rennes, France.
Katell Peoc'hINSERM U1149, UFR de Médecine Bichat, Centre de Recherche Sur L'Inflammation, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Soizic GergaudDépartement Anesthésie Réanimation, CHU Angers, Université D'Angers, 4 rue Larrey, 49933, Angers Cedex 9, France.
Nicolas NagotDépartement D'information médicale, CHU Montpellier, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Thibaud LefebvreINSERM U1149, UFR de Médecine Bichat, Centre de Recherche Sur L'Inflammation, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Sylvain LehmannLaboratoire de Biochimie Protéomique Clinique Et IRMB INSERM, CHU de Montpellier, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Hepcidane study group
Inserm · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers · FRUniversité de Montpellier · FRDélégation Paris 7 · FRUniversité de Tours · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes · FRUniversité de Poitiers · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes · FRHôpital Louis-Mourier · FRLaboratory of Excellence GR-Ex · FR

Funding

ministère de la santé (FR) STIC 2012 N° 2-12-0006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnemia is a significant problem in patients on ICU. Its commonest cause, iron deficiency (ID), is difficult to diagnose in the context of inflammation. Hepcidin is a new marker of ID. We aimed to assess whether hepcidin levels would accurately guide treatment of ID in critically ill anemic patients after a prolonged ICU stay and affect the post-ICU outcomes.

methodsIn a controlled, single-blinded, multicenter study, anemic (WHO definition) critically ill patients with an ICU stay ≥ 5 days were randomized when discharge was expected to either intervention by hepcidin treatment protocol or control. In the intervention arm, patients were treated with intravenous iron (1 g of ferric carboxymaltose) when hepcidin was < 20 μg/l and with intravenous iron and erythropoietin for 20 ≤ hepcidin < 41 μg/l. Control patients were treated according to standard care (hepcidin quantification remained blinded). Primary endpoint was the number of days spent in hospital 90 days after ICU discharge (post-ICU LOS). Secondary endpoints were day 15 anemia, day 30 fatigue, day 90 mortality and 1-year survival.

resultsOf 405 randomized patients, 399 were analyzed (201 in intervention and 198 in control arm). A total of 220 patients (55%) had ID at discharge (i.e., a hepcidin < 41 μg/l). Primary endpoint was not different (medians (IQR) post-ICU LOS 33(13;90) vs. 33(11;90) days for intervention and control, respectively, median difference - 1(- 3;1) days, p = 0.78). D90 mortality was significantly lower in intervention arm (16(8%) vs 33(16.6%) deaths, absolute risk difference - 8.7 (- 15.1 to - 2.3)%, p = 0.008, OR 95% IC, 0.46, 0.22-0.94, p = 0.035), and one-year survival was improved (p = 0.04).

conclusionTreatment of ID diagnosed according to hepcidin levels did not reduce the post-ICU LOS, but was associated with a significant reduction in D90 mortality and with improved 1-year survival in critically ill patients about to be discharged after a prolonged stay.

trial registrationwww.clinicaltrial.gov NCT02276690 (October 28, 2014; retrospectively registered).

Indexed as

Administration, IntravenousAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnemia, Iron-DeficiencyFemaleFranceHepcidinsHospitals, UniversityHumansIntensive Care UnitsIronLength of StayLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedHepcidinsIronAnemiaCritically illErythropoietinHepcidinIron deficiencyIron (treatment)Length of stayMortality

Identifiers

PMID33588893
PMCPMC7885380
OpenAlexW3116706013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.