Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33588872›Full record

ArticleJournal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition2021

Ergogenic effect of pre-exercise chicken broth ingestion on a high-intensity cycling time-trial.

Silvia Barbaresi, Laura Blancquaert, Zoran Nikolovski, Sarah de Jager, Mathew Wilson, Inge Everaert, Siegrid De Baere, Siska Croubels, Stefaan De Smet, N Tim Cable and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Silvia Barbaresi *Department of Movement and Sports Sciences, Ghent University, Watersportlaan 2, B-9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Laura Blancquaert *Department of Movement and Sports Sciences, Ghent University, Watersportlaan 2, B-9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Zoran NikolovskiFaculty of Kinesiology, University of Split, Split, Croatia.
Sarah de JagerDepartment of Movement and Sports Sciences, Ghent University, Watersportlaan 2, B-9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Mathew WilsonInstitute of Sport, Exercise and Health (ISEH), University College London, London, UK.
Inge EveraertDepartment of Movement and Sports Sciences, Ghent University, Watersportlaan 2, B-9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Siegrid De BaereDepartment of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Biochemistry, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Siska CroubelsDepartment of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Biochemistry, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Stefaan De SmetLaboratory for Animal Nutrition and Animal Product Quality, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
N Tim Cable *School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Wim Derave *Department of Movement and Sports Sciences, Ghent University, Watersportlaan 2, B-9000, Ghent, Belgium. wim.derave@ugent.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2225-5587
Ghent University · BEEnglish Institute of Sport · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GBUniversity of Split · HR

Funding

Industrial Research Fund (IOF, Ghent University) F2014/IOF-StarTT/273
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundchicken meat extract is a popular functional food in Asia. It is rich in the bioactive compounds carnosine and anserine, two histidine-containing dipeptides (HCD). Studies suggest that acute pre-exercise ingestion of chicken extracts has important applications towards exercise performance and fatigue control, but the evidence is equivocal. This study aimed to evaluate the ergogenic potential of the pre-exercise ingestion of a homemade chicken broth (CB) vs a placebo soup on a short-lasting, high-intensity cycling exercise.

methodsfourteen men participated in this double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover intervention study. Subjects ingested either CB, thereby receiving 46.4 mg/kg body weight of HCD, or a placebo soup (similar in taste without HCD) 40 min before an 8 min cycling time trial (TT) was performed. Venous blood samples were collected at arrival (fasted), before exercise and at 5 min recovery. Plasma HCD were measured with UPLC-MS/MS and glutathione (in red blood cells) was measured through HPLC. Capillary blood samples were collected at different timepoints before and after exercise.

resultsa significant improvement (p = 0.033; 5.2%) of the 8 min TT mean power was observed after CB supplementation compared to placebo. Post-exercise plasma carnosine (p <  0.05) and anserine (p <  0.001) was significantly increased after CB supplementation and not following placebo. No significant effect of CB supplementation was observed either on blood glutathione levels, nor on capillary blood analysis.

conclusionsoral CB supplementation improved the 8 min TT performance albeit it did not affect the acid-base balance or oxidative status parameters. Further research should unravel the potential role and mechanisms of HCD, present in CB, in this ergogenic approach.

Indexed as

MeatAcid-Base EquilibriumAnalysis of VarianceAnimalsAnserineAthletic PerformanceBicyclingCapillariesCarnosineChickensChromatography, LiquidCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodFoodGlutathioneHumansAnserineCarnosineGlutathionePerformance-Enhancing SubstancesPlacebosAnserineCarnosineChicken brothHigh-intensity exercisePerformancePre-exercise meal

Identifiers

PMID33588872
PMCPMC7885453
OpenAlexW3117264679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.