Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33588807›Full record

SynthesisBMC surgery2021

Systematic review on the rational use of amniotic membrane allografts in diabetic foot ulcer treatment.

Kasun Lakmal, Oshan Basnayake, D Hettiarachchi

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. HPharmaceutics · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Amniotic growth factors enhanced human pre-adipocyte cell viability and differentiation under hypoxia.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kasun LakmalDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, 25, Kynsey Place 8, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Oshan BasnayakeDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, 25, Kynsey Place 8, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
D HettiarachchiDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, 25, Kynsey Place 8, Colombo, Sri Lanka. dineshani@anat.cmb.ac.lk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1732-7339
University of Colombo · LK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiabetic foot ulcer is a complication with multiple aetiological factors which has a significant impact to patients' lives and costs to the healthcare system. The potential of human amniotic membrane to act as an allograft has been studied in relation to this condition. Aim of this study is to evaluate the current scientific evidence on its effectiveness in healing diabetic foot ulcers.

methodsPubmed, Cochrane library, and Google scholar were searched using the search terms, "Amnion" OR "Placenta" AND "Diabetic foot". (MeSH terms) in the title or the abstract field from 1st of January 2000 to 30th March 2020. The quality of published reports was assessed using standard methods. We searched for experimental and observational studies in terms of randomized control trials, prospective cohort, retrospective cohort studies and case series.

resultsWhen searched with Mesh terms, 12 citations in PubMed, 22 citations in Cochrane library and 30 in other data bases were found. After screening the studies and their reference lists, 12 studies met the inclusion criteria and the others were excluded. There were 8 randomized control trials (RCTs), 2 prospective studies and 2 retrospective studies employing different preparation methods of the amniotic membranes. A wide variation in study end points were noted. Majority of the RCTs (n = 7) were concluded with significantly higher wound closure rate compared to the conventional treatment groups. In prospective and retrospective studies, it was shown that large chronic ulcers which were resistant to closure with standard therapy achieved wound closure with amniotic membrane allografts. A meta-analysis could not be performed due to study heterogeneity, and publication bias was not assessed due to the small number of available studies which was not sufficient for accurate comparison.

conclusionEven though, the studies had some inherent heterogeneity due to different preparation methods, different study end points and outcome measurements. According to our review the current studies using amniotic membrane allografts give reliable evidence of reduction in healing time over conventional methods.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusAllograftsAmnionBiological DressingsDiabetic FootHumansTissue and Organ HarvestingTreatment OutcomeWound HealingAllograftsAmniotic membraneDiabetesFoot ulcers

Identifiers

PMID33588807
PMCPMC7885244
OpenAlexW3130399332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.