Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33588799›Full record

SynthesisBMC public health2021

Measuring capabilities in health and physical activity promotion: a systematic review.

M Till, K Abu-Omar, S Ferschl, A K Reimers, P Gelius

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Uses of the ICECAP measure of capability in adults with neurological health conditions: a scoping review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. [Capabilities for Physical Activity in Older People: Development and Testing of a Measurement Tool].Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

M TillDepartment of Sport Science and Sport, Friedrich-Alexander-University, Erlangen Nuremberg, Gebbertstraße 123b, 91058, Erlangen, Germany. maike.till@fau.de.ORCID 0000-0002-9915-7512
K Abu-OmarDepartment of Sport Science and Sport, Friedrich-Alexander-University, Erlangen Nuremberg, Gebbertstraße 123b, 91058, Erlangen, Germany.
S FerschlDepartment of Sport Science and Sport, Friedrich-Alexander-University, Erlangen Nuremberg, Gebbertstraße 123b, 91058, Erlangen, Germany.
A K ReimersDepartment of Sport Science and Sport, Friedrich-Alexander-University, Erlangen Nuremberg, Gebbertstraße 123b, 91058, Erlangen, Germany.
P GeliusDepartment of Sport Science and Sport, Friedrich-Alexander-University, Erlangen Nuremberg, Gebbertstraße 123b, 91058, Erlangen, Germany.

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 01EL1421A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe capability approach by Amartya Sen and Martha Nussbaum has gained increasing attention in the field of public health. As it combines individual, social and structural factors and shifts the focus of attention from the actual behavior towards available options for health behaviors that people can actually choose from, it may help advance our understanding of complex health issues.

objectivesThe aim of this article is to identify and describe tools available to measure capabilities within the context of health, with a specific focus on capabilities for health-enhancing physical activity.

methodWe conducted a systematic literature review using 11 databases covering scientific journal articles published in English or German between the years 2000 and 2020 with a focus on capabilities for health or physical activity.

resultsWe found a total of 51 articles meeting our inclusion criteria. Four articles measured capabilities using qualitative methods, one combined qualitative and quantitative methods, while the rest used quantitative methods. We identified a total 11 different capability questionnaires, all showing moderate to good validity/reliability. Only one questionnaire and one interview-based tool specifically dealt with capabilities for health enhancing physical activity.

conclusionAlthough we were able to identify measurement tools for capabilities in health, this review has shown that there is no generic tool available for the measurement across all population- and age-groups, and tools focusing on physical activity are scarce. However, our results can be used as guide for future projects that aim at measuring capabilities.

Indexed as

ExerciseHealth BehaviorHealth PromotionHumansPublic HealthReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesCapability approachMeasurementOperationalizationPhysical activity, health outcomesPublic healthQuestionnaires

Identifiers

PMID33588799
PMCPMC7885491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.