ArticleBMC medical imaging2021
Sensitivity analysis for interpretation of machine learning based segmentation models in cardiac MRI.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hybrid CNN-transformer model with BM3D and YOLOv8 for early detection of lung cancer in low-dose CT scans.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Stability of dynamic radiomics features in cardiac MRI under noise.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2026Article
- Hybrid method for automatic initialization and segmentation of ventricular on large-scale cardiovascular magnetic resonance images.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Evaluating Medical Image Segmentation Models Using Augmentation.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2024Article
- Integrating Artificial Intelligence Tools in the Clinical Research Setting: The Ovarian Cancer Use Case.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Ultra-high field cardiac MRI in large animals and humans for translational cardiovascular research.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- Challenges in translational machine learning.Human genetics · 2022Review
- Prime Time for Artificial Intelligence in Interventional Radiology.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2022Review
- Detecting and Extracting Brain Hemorrhages from CT Images Using Generative Convolutional Imaging Scheme.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022Article
- On the way to routine cardiac MRI at 7 Tesla - a pilot study on consecutive 84 examinations.PloS one · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundImage segmentation is a common task in medical imaging e.g., for volumetry analysis in cardiac MRI. Artificial neural networks are used to automate this task with performance similar to manual operators. However, this performance is only achieved in the narrow tasks networks are trained on. Performance drops dramatically when data characteristics differ from the training set properties. Moreover, neural networks are commonly considered black boxes, because it is hard to understand how they make decisions and why they fail. Therefore, it is also hard to predict whether they will generalize and work well with new data. Here we present a generic method for segmentation model interpretation. Sensitivity analysis is an approach where model input is modified in a controlled manner and the effect of these modifications on the model output is evaluated. This method yields insights into the sensitivity of the model to these alterations and therefore to the importance of certain features on segmentation performance.
resultsWe present an open-source Python library (misas), that facilitates the use of sensitivity analysis with arbitrary data and models. We show that this method is a suitable approach to answer practical questions regarding use and functionality of segmentation models. We demonstrate this in two case studies on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. The first case study explores the suitability of a published network for use on a public dataset the network has not been trained on. The second case study demonstrates how sensitivity analysis can be used to evaluate the robustness of a newly trained model.
conclusionsSensitivity analysis is a useful tool for deep learning developers as well as users such as clinicians. It extends their toolbox, enabling and improving interpretability of segmentation models. Enhancing our understanding of neural networks through sensitivity analysis also assists in decision making. Although demonstrated only on cardiac magnetic resonance images this approach and software are much more broadly applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.