Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33588775›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2021

Prenatal care experiences among pregnant women with obesity in Wisconsin, United States: a qualitative quality improvement assessment.

Danielle J Hurst, Nicholas B Schmuhl, Corrine I Voils, Kathleen M Antony

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Weight stigma in the preconception, pregnancy, and postpartum periods: A systematic review of women's perspectives.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Danielle J HurstUniversity of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 750 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI, 53726, USA.
Nicholas B SchmuhlDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 1010 Mound Street, Madison, WI, 53715, USA.
Corrine I VoilsDepartment of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health K6/100 Clinical Science Center, 600 Highland Avenue, WI, 53792, Madison, USA.
Kathleen M AntonyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 1010 Mound Street, Madison, WI, 53715, USA. kantony@wisc.edu.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

University of Wisconsin Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR002373 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI ELIZABETH S BURNSIDE, Allan R. Brasier · 2017 to 2026
$75.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002373
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStigma and bias experienced during prenatal care can affect quality of care and, ultimately, the health of pregnant women with obesity and their infants. We sought to 1) better understand the bias and stigma that women with BMIs ≥40 kg/m

methodsWe conducted and thematically content-analyzed 30 semi-structured interviews of women with BMIs ≥40 kg/m

resultsAll women recalled positive experiences during their perinatal care during which they felt listened to and respected by providers. However, many also described a fear of weight-related bias or recalled weight-based discrimination. Women reacted favorably to a proposed group prenatal care option for pregnant women with obesity that focused on nutrition, physical activity, and weight management. Women rated "weight" and "BMI" as the most desirable terms for describing weight, while "large size" and "obesity" were rated least desirable.

conclusionsMany pregnant women with BMIs ≥40 kg/m

Indexed as

Patient PreferencePregnancy in ObesityPrenatal CareProfessional-Patient RelationsWeight PrejudiceAdultAttitude to HealthCommunicationFemaleGestational Weight GainHumansPregnancyPrenatal EducationQualitative ResearchQuality ImprovementSocial StigmaObesityPregnancyPrenatal careProvider weight biasWeight-bias

Identifiers

PMID33588775
PMCPMC7885492
OpenAlexW3131814035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.