Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33588751›Full record

SynthesisBMC anesthesiology2021

Does a combined intravenous-volatile anesthesia offer advantages compared to an intravenous or volatile anesthesia alone: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Alexander Wolf, Helene Selpien, Helge Haberl, Matthias Unterberg

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC anesthesiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07123870 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Combined Intravenous-Inhalational Anesthesia (CIVIA) on Postoperative Recovery Patterns.

TypeinterventionalSponsorKocaeli City HospitalRan2025 to 2025Enrolled210ConditionsPostoperative Recovery, Inhalation Anesthesia, Total Intravenous AnesthesiaArmsSevofluorane, Desflurane, Total Intravenous Anesthesia(TIVA)
NCT07304206 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of the Effects of Three Different Anesthetic Methods on Postoperative Agitation in Septoplasty Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorInonu UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled3ConditionsEmergence Agitation, Septoplasty SurgeriesArmsSEVOFLURANE, TIVA, CIVIA
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Nanotherapeutics for Alleviating Anesthesia-Associated Complications.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alexander WolfRuhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany. alexander.wolf@kk-bochum.de.
Helene SelpienRuhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Helge HaberlRuhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Matthias UnterbergRuhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Ruhr University Bochum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn anesthesia, additive drug interactions are used for reducing dose and dose-dependent side-effects. The combination of propofol with volatile anesthetics is rather unusual but might have advantages compared to the single use regarding PONV, time to extubation, movement during surgery and postoperative pain perception.

methodsWe searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and CENTRAL for relevant studies comparing combined intravenous volatile anesthesia with total intravenous or balanced anesthesia. The studies identified were summarized in a meta-analysis with the standardized mean difference or risk ratio as the effect size.

resultsTen studies provided data. The risk for PONV in the recovery room was significantly reduced for a combined anesthesia compared to a balanced anesthesia (RR 0.657, CI 0.502-0.860, p-value 0.002). There was no significant difference detected either in the time to extubation or in pain perception. Movement during surgery was significantly reduced for a combined compared to a total intravenous anesthesia (RR 0.241, CI 0.135-0.428, p-value 0.000).

conclusionsThe combination of propofol and volatiles may have some advantages in the early occurrence of PONV compared to a balanced anesthesia. To sufficiently evaluate potential advantages of a combination of volatiles and propofol further high-quality trials are needed.

trial registrationPROSPERO CRD42019126627 .

Indexed as

Airway ExtubationAnesthetics, InhalationAnesthetics, IntravenousDrug Therapy, CombinationHumansIntraoperative ComplicationsMovementPostoperative ComplicationsPostoperative Nausea and VomitingPostoperative PainPropofolTimeAnesthetics, InhalationAnesthetics, IntravenousPropofolCIVACombined intravenous volatile anesthesiaGeneral anesthesiaMeta-analysisPONVPostoperative painTime to extubation

Identifiers

PMID33588751
PMCPMC7883423
OpenAlexW3131007340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.