Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33588652›Full record

ArticlePerspectives in public health2022

Meeting the UK Government's prevention agenda: primary care practitioners can be trained in skills to prevent disease and support self-management.

W Lawrence, D Watson, H Barker, C Vogel, E Rahman, M Barker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perspectives in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

W LawrenceMedical Research Council Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK; NIHR, Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1264-0438
D WatsonGlobal Health Research Institute, School of Human Development and Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
H BarkerPublic Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
C VogelMedical Research Council Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK; NIHR, Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
E RahmanHealth Education England (Wessex), School of Public Health, Southern House, Otterbourne, Hants, UK.
M BarkerMedical Research Council Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK; NIHR, Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_12011/4Medical Research Council MR/N011848/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe NHS Long Term Plan has a prevention focus and ambition to support patients to self-manage disease through improving health behaviours. An essential requirement of self-management is behaviour change, but many practitioners have not been trained in skills to support behaviour change. 'Healthy Conversation Skills' (HCS) training was developed at the University of Southampton for this purpose. This article reports on a pilot study that aimed to assess the feasibility of primary care practitioners adopting HCS in their routine practice. It describes their experiences and level of competence post-training.

methodsHealth Education England (Wessex) commissioned HCS training for 18 primary care practitioners. Fifteen of these practitioners were subsequently observed in their consultations at one or two time points; face-to-face semi-structured, reflective feedback interviews were conducted immediately following the observations. Practitioners' HCS competence was assessed from the observations and interviews using a previously developed and published coding rubric. The interview data were analysed thematically to understand practitioners' experiences of using the new skills.

resultsPractitioners demonstrated competence in embedding the skills into their routine practice following HCS training. They reflected on how patients liked being asked questions, the usefulness of setting SMARTER (Specific, Measured, Action-oriented, Realistic, Timed, Evaluated and Reviewed) goals and the power of listening. They could also identify facilitators of skill use and ways to overcome challenges such as patients with competing priorities and organisational constraints. They found the skills valuable as a way of empowering patients to make changes to manage their own health.

conclusionsHCS are acceptable to primary care practitioners, can be readily adopted into their routine consultations and are a helpful strategy for supporting patients to make changes. HCS training has the potential to be a sustainable, scalable and effective way of contributing to the prevention agenda by supporting disease self-management, and hence of addressing today's epidemic of lifestyle-related conditions.

Indexed as

Self-ManagementGovernmentHumansPilot ProjectsPrimary Health CareUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID33588652
PMCPMC9047100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.