Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33588615›Full record

ArticleLupus2021

Improvement of lupus-associated fatigue with modafinil: Report of two cases.

Peter Korsten, Silvia Piantoni

Open access · hybridAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Lupus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 97% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Peter KorstenDepartment of Nephrology and Rheumatology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6065-5680
Silvia PiantoniDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, ASST Spedali Civili and University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0913-0197
Universitätsmedizin Göttingen · DEUniversity of Brescia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fatigue is a frequently reported and disabling symptom in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The management of Lupus-associated fatigue (LAF) is complex and requires the exclusion of disease activity and comorbidities as potentially treatable causes. Standard of care recommendations includes psychological counselling and regular physical activity. However, many SLE patients still report the persistence of LAF despite these measures. Therefore, pharmacological management may be required, which has been insufficiently investigated in clinical trials. Here, we report two patients who improved with pharmacological treatment with modafinil (MODA), a central nervous system stimulant. Both patients had an overall low disease activity (SLEDAI-2K score of 0). Their FACIT fatigue scores were 15 and 20, respectively (with a maximum score of 52, where 52 indicates the best quality of life). With MODA treatment, the first patient's FACIT fatigue score improved from 15 to 42, the second patient's score from 20 to 37. In the latter patient, it returned to 21 after stopping the drug and increased back again to 37 after re-treatment.In conclusion, our report demonstrates, for the first time, that MODA treatment is a potential pharmacological treatment option in selected patients with LAF. Clinical trials in SLE are required to confirm our observations.

Indexed as

FatigueFemaleHumansLupus Erythematosus, SystemicMiddle AgedModafinilQuality of LifeSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeModafinilcentral nervous system drugschronic fatigue disordermodafinilpharmacologySystemic lupus erythematosus

Identifiers

PMID33588615
PMCPMC8056711
OpenAlexW3133346694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.