Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33588501›Full record

ArticleZentralblatt fur Chirurgie2021

[Surgical Education in the Digital Age - Virtual Reality, Augmented Reality and Robotics in the Medical School].

Sebastian Kuhn, Florentine Huettl, Kim Deutsch, Elisa Kirchgässner, Tobias Huber, Werner Kneist

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zentralblatt fur Chirurgie, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Digital Transformation in Healthcare: Technology Acceptance and Its Applications.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  9. [Use of Video Online Seminars During Clinical Phase of Medical Study from the Perspective of Teachers and Students].Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sebastian Kuhn *AG 4 - Digitale Medizin, Medizinische Fakultät OWL, Universität Bielefeld.ORCID 0000-0002-8031-2973
Florentine Huettl *Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Deutschland.
Kim DeutschZentrum für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Deutschland.
Elisa KirchgässnerZentrum für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Deutschland.
Tobias HuberKlinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Deutschland.
Werner KneistKlinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein- und Abdominalchirurgie, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, Mainz, Deutschland.
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe digital transformation of healthcare is changing the medical profession. Augmented/Virtual Reality (AR/VR) and robotics are being increasingly used in different clinical contexts and require supporting education and training, which must begin within the medical school. There is currently a large discrepancy between the high demand and the number of scientifically proven concepts. The aim of this thesis was the conceptual design and structured evaluation of a newly developed learning/teaching concept for the digital transformation of medicine, with a special focus on the influence of surgical teaching.

methodsThirty-five students participated in three courses of the blended learning curriculum "Medicine in the digital age". The 4th module of this course deals with virtual reality, augmented reality and robotics in surgery. It is divided into the following course parts: (1) immersive surgery simulation of a laparoscopic cholecystectomy, (2) liver surgery planning using AR/VR, (3) basic skills on the VR simulator for robotic surgery, (4) collaborative surgery planning in virtual space and (5) expert discussion. After completing the overall curriculum, a qualitative and quantitative evaluation of the course concept was carried out by means of semi-structured interviews and standardised pre-/post-evaluation questionnaires.

resultsIn the qualitative evaluation procedure of the interviews, 79 text statements were assigned to four main categories. The largest share (35%) was taken up by statements on the "expert discussion", which the students consider to be an elementary part of the course concept. In addition, the students perceived the course as a horizon-widening "learning experience" (29% of the statements) with high "practical relevance" (27%). The quantitative student evaluation shows a positive development in the three sub-competences knowledge, skills and attitude.

conclusionSurgical teaching can be profitably used to develop digital skills. The speed of the change process of digital transformation in the surgical specialty must be considered. Curricular adaptation should be anchored in the course concept.

Indexed as

Virtual RealityAugmented RealityClinical CompetenceCurriculumHumansSchools, Medical

Identifiers

PMID33588501
PMCPMC7884202
OpenAlexW3129365457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.