Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33588291›Full record

ArticleVision research2021

The effects of visual discomfort and chromaticity separation on neural processing during a visual task.

Lisa C Lindquist, Gregory R McIntire, Sarah M Haigh

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vision research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A mechanistic account of visual discomfort.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lisa C LindquistCenter for Integrative Neuroscience, University of Nevada, Reno, 1664 North Virginia Street, Reno, NV 89557, United States.
Gregory R McIntireCenter for Integrative Neuroscience, University of Nevada, Reno, 1664 North Virginia Street, Reno, NV 89557, United States.
Sarah M HaighCenter for Integrative Neuroscience, University of Nevada, Reno, 1664 North Virginia Street, Reno, NV 89557, United States. Electronic address: shaigh@unr.edu.
University of Nevada, Reno · US

Funding

Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality CoreP20GM103650 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO · PI WEBSTER, MICHAEL A · 2012 to 2022
$20.9M
Biomarkers of auditory processing in schizophrenia: do they reflect symptom severity? An investigation in schizotypyR15MH122935 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO · PI BERRYHILL, MARIAN E, HAIGH, SARAH M · 2020 to 2022
$424k
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103650NIMH NIH HHS R15 MH122935
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual stimuli that are uncomfortable to look at evoke a large neural response suggesting altered processing. While there is some evidence linking uncomfortable achromatic stimuli to impaired visual processing, the effect of uncomfortable chromatic patterns on visual cognition has yet to be explored. Large differences in chromaticity separation (e.g. red and blue) elicit visual discomfort, larger metabolic responses, larger visual evoked potentials, and greater alpha suppression compared to small chromaticity separations (e.g. pink and purple). We investigated the impact of stimuli that varied in their chromaticity separation (calculated in perceptual color space) on a visual task and their effect on neural responses across the cortex. Thirty participants completed a continuous pairs task (letters changed at 3 Hz) while grating patterns that differed in their chromaticity separation alternated with a grey screen at 5 Hz. The different temporal frequencies allowed for steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs) to the two stimulus-types to be measured simultaneously using electroencephalography (EEG). A subset of participants rated the gratings on a 9-point scale of discomfort. We observed greater ratings of discomfort and increased power at 5 Hz with the larger chromaticity separations. The increase in 5 Hz power with greater chromaticity separation was evident across the cortex. However, there was no significant effect of chromaticity separation on power at 3 Hz, or on reaction times, and no consistent effect on behavioral accuracy. Despite eliciting heightened neural responses across the cortex, short term exposure to uncomfortable chromatic stimuli does not adversely impact visual task performance.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyEvoked Potentials, VisualCerebral CortexHumansPhotic StimulationVisual PerceptionChromaticity separationContinuous pairs taskEEGSSVEPVisual discomfort

Identifiers

PMID33588291
PMCPMC7987861
OpenAlexW3129558644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.