Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33588206›Full record

ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2021

Providing care under extreme adversity: The impact of the Yemen conflict on the personal and professional lives of health workers.

Shatha Elnakib, Sarah Elaraby, Fouad Othman, Huda BaSaleem, Nagiba A Abdulghani AlShawafi, Iman Ahmed Saleh Al-Gawfi, Fouzia Shafique, Eman Al-Kubati, Nuzhat Rafique, Hannah Tappis

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
17.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Mental health services during the war in Ukraine: 2-years follow up study.International journal of mental health systems · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Shatha ElnakibJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Sarah ElarabyJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA; Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
Fouad OthmanTaiz University, Taiz, Yemen.
Huda BaSaleemAden University, Aden, Yemen.
Nagiba A Abdulghani AlShawafiSana'a University, Sana'a, Yemen.
Iman Ahmed Saleh Al-GawfiTaiz University, Taiz, Yemen.
Fouzia ShafiqueUNICEF HQ, New York, USA.
Eman Al-KubatiUNICEF Yemen Country Office, Sana'a, Yemen.
Nuzhat RafiqueUNICEF Yemen Country Office, Sana'a, Yemen.
Hannah TappisJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: Hannah.Tappis@jhu.edu.
Johns Hopkins University · USTaiz University · YEYemenia University · YESana'a University · YEUnited Nations Children's Fund · USUniversity of Aden · YE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The war in Yemen, described as the world's 'worst humanitarian crisis,' has seen numerous attacks against health care. While global attention to attacks on health workers has increased significantly over the past decade, gaps in research on the lived experiences of frontline staff persist. This study draws on perspectives of frontline health workers in Yemen to understand the impact of the ongoing conflict on their personal and professional lives. Forty-three facility-based health worker interviews, and 6 focus group discussions with community-based health workers and midwives were conducted in Sana'a, Aden and Taiz governorates at the peak of the Yemen conflict. Data were analysed using content analysis methods. Findings highlight the extent and range of violence confronting health workers in Yemen as well as the coping strategies they use to attenuate the impact of acute and chronic stressors resulting from conflict. We find that the complex security situation - characterized by multiple parties to the conflict, politicization of humanitarian aid and constraints in humanitarian access - was coupled with everyday stressors that prevented health workers from carrying out their work. Participants reported sporadic attacks by armed civilians, tensions with patients, and harassment at checkpoints. Working conditions were dire, and participants reported chronic suspension of salaries as well as serious shortages of essential supplies and medicines. Themes specific to coping centered around fatalism and religious motivation, resourcefulness and innovation, and sense of duty and patriotism. Our findings demonstrate that health workers experience substantial stress and face various pressures while delivering lifesaving services in Yemen. While they exhibit considerable resilience and coping, they have needs that remain largely unaddressed. Accordingly, the humanitarian community should direct more attention to responding to the mental health and psychosocial needs of health workers, while actively working to ameliorate the conditions in which they work.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareHealth PersonnelHealth WorkforceHumansMotivationYemenConflictFrontline health workerHealth service deliveryHumanitarianViolenceWarYemen

Identifiers

PMID33588206
PMCPMC7938221
OpenAlexW3127359946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.