ArticleMedical image analysis2021
A hybrid, image-based and biomechanics-based registration approach to markerless intraoperative nodule localization during video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.
Article in Medical image analysis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02966847 (Assessment of Cone-beam Computed Tomography), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Assessment of Cone-beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) Assistance to Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of mixed reality and computed tomography-guided preoperative hook-wire localization for pulmonary nodules in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a noninferiority randomized clinical trial.Scientific reports · 2026Trial
- Tumour Localisation Technologies in Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Scoping Review of Marking and Detection Methods.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Advancements in 3D lung models for minimally invasive lung cancer surgery: from static to real-time dynamic modeling.Translational lung cancer research · 2025Review
- A novel personalized time-varying biomechanical model for estimating lung tumor motion and deformation.Medical physics · 2025Article
- UDRNet: unsupervised deformable registration network of lung CT images with hybrid attention mechanism.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Advances of surgical robotics: image-guided classification and application.National science review · 2024Review
- Assessment of Heterogeneity in Lung Structure and Function During Mechanical Ventilation: A Review of Methodologies.Journal of engineering and science in medical diagnostics and therapy · 2022Review
- A pilot study of intraoperative localization of peripheral small pulmonary tumors by cone-beam computed tomography: sandwich marking technique.Journal of thoracic disease · 2022Article
- A hybrid, image-based and biomechanics-based registration approach to markerless intraoperative nodule localization during video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.Medical image analysis · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The resection of small, low-dense or deep lung nodules during video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is surgically challenging. Nodule localization methods in clinical practice typically rely on the preoperative placement of markers, which may lead to clinical complications. We propose a markerless lung nodule localization framework for VATS based on a hybrid method combining intraoperative cone-beam CT (CBCT) imaging, free-form deformation image registration, and a poroelastic lung model with allowance for air evacuation. The difficult problem of estimating intraoperative lung deformations is decomposed into two more tractable sub-problems: (i) estimating the deformation due the change of patient pose from preoperative CT (supine) to intraoperative CBCT (lateral decubitus); and (ii) estimating the pneumothorax deformation, i.e. a collapse of the lung within the thoracic cage. We were able to demonstrate the feasibility of our localization framework with a retrospective validation study on 5 VATS clinical cases. Average initial errors in the range of 22 to 38 mm were reduced to the range of 4 to 14 mm, corresponding to an error correction in the range of 63 to 85%. To our knowledge, this is the first markerless lung deformation compensation method dedicated to VATS and validated on actual clinical data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.