Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33588116›Full record

ArticleMedical image analysis2021

Segmentation evaluation with sparse ground truth data: Simulating true segmentations as perfect/imperfect as those generated by humans.

Jieyu Li, Jayaram K Udupa, Yubing Tong, Lisheng Wang, Drew A Torigian

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical image analysis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Sparse Annotation is Sufficient for Bootstrapping Dense Segmentation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Jieyu LiInstitute of Image Processing and Pattern Recognition, Department of Automation, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 800 Dongchuan RD, Shanghai, 200240, China; Medical Image Processing Group, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, 602 Goddard building, 3710 Hamilton Walk, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, United States.
Jayaram K UdupaMedical Image Processing Group, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, 602 Goddard building, 3710 Hamilton Walk, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, United States. Electronic address: jay@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
Yubing TongMedical Image Processing Group, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, 602 Goddard building, 3710 Hamilton Walk, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, United States.
Lisheng WangInstitute of Image Processing and Pattern Recognition, Department of Automation, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 800 Dongchuan RD, Shanghai, 200240, China.
Drew A TorigianMedical Image Processing Group, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, 602 Goddard building, 3710 Hamilton Walk, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, United States.
University of Pennsylvania · USShanghai Jiao Tong University · CN

Funding

Automated Object Contouring Methods & Software for Radiotherapy PlanningR42CA199735 · NCI · QUANTITATIVE RADIOLOGY SOLUTIONS, LLC · PI OWENS, STEVE, UDUPA, JAYARAM K · 2018 to 2020
$1.9M
NCI NIH HHS R42 CA199735
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fully annotated data sets play important roles in medical image segmentation and evaluation. Expense and imprecision are the two main issues in generating ground truth (GT) segmentations. In this paper, in an attempt to overcome these two issues jointly, we propose a method, named SparseGT, which exploit variability among human segmenters to maximally save manual workload in GT generation for evaluating actual segmentations by algorithms. Pseudo ground truth (p-GT) segmentations are created by only a small fraction of workload and with human-level perfection/imperfection, and they can be used in practice as a substitute for fully manual GT in evaluating segmentation algorithms at the same precision. p-GT segmentations are generated by first selecting slices sparsely, where manual contouring is conducted only on these sparse slices, and subsequently filling segmentations on other slices automatically. By creating p-GT with different levels of sparseness, we determine the largest workload reduction achievable for each considered object, where the variability of the generated p-GT is statistically indistinguishable from inter-segmenter differences in full manual GT segmentations for that object. Furthermore, we investigate the segmentation evaluation errors introduced by variability in manual GT by applying p-GT in evaluation of actual segmentations by an algorithm. Experiments are conducted on ∼500 computed tomography (CT) studies involving six objects in two body regions, Head & Neck and Thorax, where optimal sparseness and corresponding evaluation errors are determined for each object and each strategy. Our results indicate that creating p-GT by the concatenated strategy of uniformly selecting sparse slices and filling segmentations via deep-learning (DL) network show highest manual workload reduction by ∼80-96% without sacrificing evaluation accuracy compared to fully manual GT. Nevertheless, other strategies also have obvious contributions in different situations. A non-uniform strategy for slice selection shows its advantage for objects with irregular shape change from slice to slice. An interpolation strategy for filling segmentations can achieve ∼60-90% of workload reduction in simulating human-level GT without the need of an actual training stage and shows potential in enlarging data sets for training p-GT generation networks. We conclude that not only over 90% reduction in workload is feasible without sacrificing evaluation accuracy but also the suitable strategy and the optimal sparseness level achievable for creating p-GT are object- and application-specific.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsTomography, X-Ray ComputedHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedGround truth generationInter-segmenter variabilityMedical image segmentationSegmentation evaluation

Identifiers

PMID33588116
PMCPMC7933105
OpenAlexW3125104690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.