Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33588041›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American College of Surgeons2021

NIH Funding for Surgeon-Scientists in the US: What Is the Current Status?

Lindsay A Demblowski, Brad Busse, George Santangelo, Andrew M Blakely, Patricia L Turner, David B Hoyt, Martha A Zeiger

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Trends in Specialty Training and National Institutes of Health Funding Among Surgeon-Scientists.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. A Step in the Right Direction for Surgeon-Scientists.Journal of the American College of Surgeons · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lindsay A DemblowskiSurgical Oncology Program, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD.
Brad BusseOffice of Portfolio Analysis, Division of Program Coordination, Planning, and Strategic Initiatives, Office of the Director, NIH, Bethesda, MD.
George SantangeloOffice of Portfolio Analysis, Division of Program Coordination, Planning, and Strategic Initiatives, Office of the Director, NIH, Bethesda, MD.
Andrew M BlakelySurgical Oncology Program, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD.
Patricia L TurnerAmerican College of Surgeons, Chicago, IL.
David B HoytAmerican College of Surgeons, Chicago, IL.
Martha A ZeigerSurgical Oncology Program, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD. Electronic address: martha.zeiger@nih.gov.
National Cancer Institute · USAmerican College of Surgeons · USDivision of Program Coordination Planning and Strategic Initiatives · US

Funding

Training and Development of Outstanding Surgeon ScientistsZIEBC011992 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI ZEIGER, MARTHA · 2020 to 2024
$9.6M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIE BC011992
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent literature suggests that the future of surgeon-scientists in the US has been threatened for the past several decades. However, we documented an overall increase in NIH funding for surgeon-scientists, as well as the number of NIH-funded surgeons, from 2010 to 2020. STUDY

designNIH-funded principal investigators (PIs) were identified for June 2010 and June 2020 using the NIH internal data platform iSearch Grants (version 2.4). Biographical sketches were searched for key terms to identify surgeon-scientists. Grant research types and total grant costs were collected. American Association of Medical Colleges data were used to determine total surgeon and physician populations. Bivariate chi-square analyses were performed using population totals and were corroborated using z-tests of population proportions using JMP (version 13.0.0). A 2-tailed p value <0.05 was considered significant.

resultsIn June of 2020, a total of 1,031 surgeon-scientists held $872,456,710 in NIH funding. The percentage of funded surgeons significantly increased from 2010 (0.5%) to 2020 (0.7%) (p < 0.05), and the percentage of funded other physicians significantly decreased from 2.2% in 2010 to 1.6% in 2020 (p < 0.05). All surgeons sustained R grant funding at both time points (58% in 2020 and 60% in 2010), and specifically maintained basic science-focused R grants (73% in 2020 and 78% in 2010).

conclusionsOur study found surgeon-scientists are increasing in number and NIH funding and are becoming more diverse in their research efforts, while maintaining a focus on basic science.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchHumansNational Institutes of Health (U.S.)Research PersonnelResearch Support as TopicSpecialties, SurgicalSurgeonsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID33588041
PMCPMC9376791
OpenAlexW3130034921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.