Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33587971›Full record

ArticleRadiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology2021

Predictors for post-treatment biopsy outcomes after prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy.

Michael J Zelefsky, Debra A Goldman, Margaret Hopkins, Attapol Pinitpatcharalert, Sean McBride, Daniel Gorovets, Behfar Ehdaie, Samson W Fine, Victor E Reuter, Neelam Tyagi and 4 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05705921 (Standard Moderately Hypofractionated Radiotherapy vs. Ultra-hypofractionated Focal Lesion Ablative Microboost in Prostate Cancer, Hypo-FLAME 3.0), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05705921 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Standard Moderately Hypofractionated Radiotherapy vs. Ultra-hypofractionated Focal Lesion Ablative Microboost in Prostate Cancer, Hypo-FLAME 3.0

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Netherlands Cancer InstituteRan2023 to 2032Enrolled484ConditionsProstate CancerArmsRadiotherapy standard, Radiotherapy Hypo-FLAME
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. No disease left behind.Oncotarget · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Automatic localization of the prostatic urethra for image guided radiation therapy.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2021
    Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Michael J ZelefskyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA. Electronic address: zelefskm@mskcc.org.
Debra A GoldmanDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.
Margaret HopkinsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.
Attapol PinitpatcharalertDivision of Radiation Oncology, Thammasat University Hospital, Pathumthani, Thailand.
Sean McBrideDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.
Daniel GorovetsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.
Behfar EhdaieDepartment of Urology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.
Samson W FineDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.
Victor E ReuterDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.
Neelam TyagiDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.
Laura HappersettDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.
Achiraya TeyateetiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA; Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Bangkok, Thailand.
Zhigang ZhangDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA. Electronic address: zhang@mskcc.org.
Marisa A KollmeierDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USThammasat University Hospital · TH

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate predictors associated with post-treatment biopsy outcomes after stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for localized prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND

methods257 patients treated with prostate SBRT to dose levels of 32.5 Gy to >40 Gy in 5-6 fractions underwent a post-treatment biopsy performed approximately two years after treatment to evaluate local control status. 73 had% intermediate-risk disease (n = 187) and the remaining 17% (n = 43) and 10% (n = 27) had low-risk and high-risk disease, respectively.

resultsThe incidence of positive, negative, and treatment-effect post-treatment biopsies were 15.6%, 57.6%, and 26.8%, respectively. The incidence of a positive biopsy according to dose was 37.5% (n = 9/24), 21.4% (n = 6/28), 19.4% (n = 6/31), and 10.9% (n = 19/174) for 32.5 Gy, 35 Gy, 37.5 Gy, and >40 Gy, respectively. In a multivariable model, patients treated with SBRT doses of <40 Gy and those with unfavorable-intermediate-risk or high-risk disease had higher likelihood of a positive post-treatment biopsy. A positive post-SBRT biopsy was associated with a significantly higher likelihood of subsequent PSA relapse at five years (Positive biopsy: 57%, 95% CI: 29-77% compared to negative biopsy: 7%, 95% CI: 3-14%; p < 0.001).

conclusionBased on two-year post-SBRT biopsies, excellent tumor control was achieved when dose levels of 40 Gy or higher were used. Standard SBRT dose levels of 35-37.5 Gy were associated with a higher likelihood of a positive post-treatment biopsy. Two-year positive post-treatment biopsies pre-dated the development of PSA failure in the majority of patients.

Indexed as

Prostatic NeoplasmsRadiosurgeryBiopsyHumansMaleProstate-Specific AntigenProstate-Specific AntigenLocalized prostate cancerPost-treatment biopsyPredictive factorsStereotactic body radiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID33587971
PMCPMC10187562
OpenAlexW3129679350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.