Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33587786›Full record

ArticleBJU international2022

Masculinizing surgery in disorders/differences of sex development: clinician- and participant-evaluated appearance and function.

Tim C van de Grift, Marion Rapp, Gundela Holmdahl, Lise Duranteau, Agneta Nordenskjold, dsd-LIFE group

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BJU international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. [Aesthetic goals of hypospadias repair].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Differences of sex development.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Tim C van de GriftDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4382-7000
Marion RappKlinik fur Kinder- und Jugendmedizin, Universitat zu Lubeck, Lubeck, Germany.
Gundela HolmdahlDepartment of Women's and Children's Health and Centre for Molecular Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Lise DuranteauAdolescent and Young Adult Gynaecology Unit and Reference Center for Rare, Diseases of Genital Development, AP.HP Paris Saclay University, Bicêtre Hospital, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France.
Agneta NordenskjoldDepartment of Women's and Children's Health and Centre for Molecular Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-6638-4631
dsd-LIFE group
Karolinska University Hospital · SEAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLApple (Israel) · ILUniversitäres Kinderwunschzentrum Lübeck · DEUniversité Paris-Saclay · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo report the long-term follow-up outcomes of masculinizing surgery in disorders/differences of sex development (DSD), including both physicians' and patients' perspectives on appearance and functional outcome, including sexuality. PATIENTS AND

methodsIn total, 1040 adolescents (age ≥16 years) and adults with a DSD took part in this multicentre cross-sectional clinical study in six European countries in 2014/2015. Of those, 150 living in other than the female gender had some kind of masculinizing surgery: hypospadias repair, orchidopexy, breast reduction and/or gonadectomy. The study protocol included medical data collection, an optional genital examination, and patient-reported outcomes including satisfaction with appearance and current sexual functioning.

resultsDiagnoses included partial and mixed gonadal dysgenesis (45,XO/46,XY; n = 38), Klinefelter syndrome/46,XX males (n = 57), and various 46,XY DSDs (n = 42; e.g. partial androgen insensitivity syndrome, severe hypospadias) and 13 with other diagnoses. Of the participants, 84 underwent hypospadias surgery, 86 orchidopexy, 52 gonadectomy and 32 breast reduction (combinations possible). Physicians evaluated anatomical appearance at genital examination as poor in approximately 11% of patients. After hypospadias surgery, 38% of participants reported that they were (very) dissatisfied with anatomical appearance and 20% with function. The physician and patient evaluations were moderately correlated (r = 0.43).

conclusionThe majority of participants were neutral to satisfied with the appearance and function in the long-term after masculinizing surgery. Given the initial severe phenotype and a risk of unsatisfactory results after masculinizing surgery in DSD, treatment should be handled by experienced multidisciplinary teams in order to optimize the postoperative results.

Indexed as

Disorders of Sex DevelopmentHypospadiasAdolescentCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMalePatient Reported Outcome MeasuresSexual Developmentdisorders of sex developmenthypospadiasmasculinizing surgerypatient-reported outcomesexual outcomeurological outcome#Urology

Identifiers

PMID33587786
PMCPMC9292912
OpenAlexW3130250899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.