Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33587612›Full record

ArticleACS applied materials & interfaces2021

Engineering of Biocompatible Coacervate-Based Synthetic Cells.

Marleen H M E van Stevendaal, Laurynas Vasiukas, N Amy Yewdall, Alexander F Mason, Jan C M van Hest

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS applied materials & interfaces, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Patchy Membrane-Directed Multiphase Complex Coacervation.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Microcondensate-Mediated Intracellular Infusion of mRNA Across the Plasma Membrane.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Engineering Motile Coacervate Droplets via Nanomotor Stabilization.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marleen H M E van StevendaalInstitute for Complex Molecular Systems, Eindhoven University of Technology, P. O. Box 513 (STO 3.41), 5600MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Laurynas VasiukasInstitute for Complex Molecular Systems, Eindhoven University of Technology, P. O. Box 513 (STO 3.41), 5600MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
N Amy YewdallInstitute for Molecules and Materials, Radboud University, 6525 AJ Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Alexander F MasonInstitute for Complex Molecular Systems, Eindhoven University of Technology, P. O. Box 513 (STO 3.41), 5600MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2847-0253
Jan C M van HestInstitute for Complex Molecular Systems, Eindhoven University of Technology, P. O. Box 513 (STO 3.41), 5600MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7973-2404

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polymer-stabilized complex coacervate microdroplets have emerged as a robust platform for synthetic cell research. Their unique core-shell properties enable the sequestration of high concentrations of biologically relevant macromolecules and their subsequent release through the semipermeable membrane. These unique properties render the synthetic cell platform highly suitable for a range of biomedical applications, as long as its biocompatibility upon interaction with biological cells is ensured. The purpose of this study is to investigate how the structure and formulation of these coacervate-based synthetic cells impact the viability of several different cell lines. Through careful examination of the individual synthetic cell components, it became evident that the presence of free polycation and membrane-forming polymer had to be prevented to ensure cell viability. After closely examining the structure-toxicity relationship, a set of conditions could be found whereby no detrimental effects were observed, when the artificial cells were cocultured with RAW264.7 cells. This opens up a range of possibilities to use this modular system for biomedical applications and creates design rules for the next generation of coacervate-based, biomedically relevant particles.

Indexed as

Cell EngineeringAmyloseAnimalsArtificial CellsBiocompatible MaterialsCells, CulturedCell SurvivalHeLa CellsHumansMaterials TestingMiceMolecular StructureParticle SizePolymersRAW 264.7 CellsSurface PropertiesAmyloseBiocompatible MaterialsPolymersbiocompatibilityblock copolymerscomplex coacervatespolycationsprotocellsself-assemblysynthetic cells

Identifiers

PMID33587612
PMCPMC7908014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.