Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33587336›Full record

ArticleEMBO molecular medicine2021

Biofabricating murine and human myo-substitutes for rapid volumetric muscle loss restoration.

Marco Costantini, Stefano Testa, Ersilia Fornetti, Claudia Fuoco, Carles Sanchez Riera, Minghao Nie, Sergio Bernardini, Alberto Rainer, Jacopo Baldi, Carmine Zoccali and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EMBO molecular medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Microfluidics-Based Microcarriers for Live-Cell Delivery.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Marco Costantini *Institute of Physical Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland.
Stefano Testa *Department of Biology, Rome University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Ersilia FornettiDepartment of Biology, Rome University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Claudia FuocoDepartment of Biology, Rome University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Carles Sanchez RieraDepartment of Biology, Rome University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Minghao NieDepartment of Mechano-Informatics, Graduate School of Information Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Sergio BernardiniDepartment of Biology, Rome University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Alberto RainerDepartment of Engineering, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy.
Jacopo BaldiIRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Carmine ZoccaliIRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Roberto BiaginiIRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Luisa CastagnoliDepartment of Biology, Rome University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Libero VitielloDepartment of Biology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Bert BlaauwDepartment of Biomedical Science and Venetian Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Dror SeliktarDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Techion Institute, Haifa, Israel.
Wojciech ŚwięszkowskiFaculty of Materials Science and Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland.
Piotr GarsteckiInstitute of Physical Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland.
Shoji TakeuchiDepartment of Mechano-Informatics, Graduate School of Information Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Gianni CesareniDepartment of Biology, Rome University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9528-6018
Stefano CannataDepartment of Biology, Rome University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Cesare GargioliDepartment of Biology, Rome University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1742-3969

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The importance of skeletal muscle tissue is undoubted being the controller of several vital functions including respiration and all voluntary locomotion activities. However, its regenerative capability is limited and significant tissue loss often leads to a chronic pathologic condition known as volumetric muscle loss. Here, we propose a biofabrication approach to rapidly restore skeletal muscle mass, 3D histoarchitecture, and functionality. By recapitulating muscle anisotropic organization at the microscale level, we demonstrate to efficiently guide cell differentiation and myobundle formation both in vitro and in vivo. Of note, upon implantation, the biofabricated myo-substitutes support the formation of new blood vessels and neuromuscular junctions-pivotal aspects for cell survival and muscle contractile functionalities-together with an advanced muscle mass and force recovery. Altogether, these data represent a solid base for further testing the myo-substitutes in large animal size and a promising platform to be eventually translated into clinical scenarios.

Indexed as

Muscular DiseasesTissue EngineeringAnimalsCell DifferentiationHumansMiceMuscle, Skeletalbioprintingskeletal musclestem cellstissue engineeringVML

Identifiers

PMID33587336
PMCPMC7933978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.