Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33587265›Full record

ArticleScience China. Life sciences2021

Removal of roosters alters the domestic phenotype and microbial and genetic profile of hens.

Hai Xiang, Siyu Chen, Hui Zhang, Xu Zhu, Dan Wang, Huagui Liu, Jikun Wang, Tao Yin, Langqing Liu, Minghua Kong and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Science China. Life sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Hai Xiang *Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Molecular Design and Precise Breeding; School of Life Science and Engineering, Foshan University, Foshan, 528225, China.
Siyu Chen *Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Molecular Design and Precise Breeding; School of Life Science and Engineering, Foshan University, Foshan, 528225, China.
Hui ZhangNational Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding; Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture; College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Xu ZhuNational Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding; Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture; College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Dan WangNational Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding; Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture; College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Huagui LiuInstitute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, Beijing Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Beijing, 100097, China.
Jikun WangKey Laboratory of Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau Animal Genetic Resource Reservation and Utilization, Ministry of Education; Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, Southwest Minzu University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Tao YinNational Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding; Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture; College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Langqing LiuNational Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding; Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture; College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Minghua KongNational Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding; Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture; College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Jian ZhangInstitute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, Beijing Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Beijing, 100097, China.
Hua LiGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Molecular Design and Precise Breeding; School of Life Science and Engineering, Foshan University, Foshan, 528225, China.
Simon TurnerAnimal and Veterinary Sciences Research Group, Scotland's Rural College, Edinburgh, EH9 3JG, UK. Simon.Turner@sruc.ac.uk.
Xingbo ZhaoGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Molecular Design and Precise Breeding; School of Life Science and Engineering, Foshan University, Foshan, 528225, China. zhxb@cau.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hens are raised apart from roosters in modern poultry production, a substantial change from their natural social structure. We compared productivity, injuries, behavior, physiology, microbiome and transcriptome of hens housed with (R+) or without (R-) roosters to quantify the effects of this change in social structure. Hens were raised free-range from 70 to 280 days when 30 birds per treatment were assigned to battery cages until Day 315 (R+C vs. R-C), while 30 birds per treatment remained in free-range pens (R+F vs. R-F). Response to a novel environment and object, behavioral time budgets, cecum microbiome, blood composition and transcriptomic sequencing of thigh muscle and spleen were analyzed. Hens housed without roosters showed better survival, consumed less food, produced more eggs and had better feed conversion. R+F hens clustered around the rooster and were less mobile in the novel environment and object tests. R+F hens displayed the richest microbiome, and the presence of roosters resulted in differentially expressed genes related to muscle development, cellular processes, environmental information processing and immune function. Removing roosters from housed hens intensified desirable characteristics favored by domestication probably operating by deprivation of mating behavior and reduced fear, along with altered microbial and genetic function.

Indexed as

Genetic ProfilePhenotypeSocial StructureAnimalsChickensFemaleGastrointestinal MicrobiomeMalechickendomestic phenotypefeargut microbiomeroostertranscriptome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.