Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33587257›Full record

ArticleThe Psychiatric quarterly2021

Receipt of Telepsychiatry and Emergency Department Visit Outcomes in New York State.

Cordelia Zhong, Rain E Freeman, Krislyn M Boggs, Kori S Zachrison, Jingya Gao, Janice A Espinola, Carlos A Camargo

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Psychiatric quarterly, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. U.S. Emergency Department Telepsychiatry Use in 2019.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cordelia ZhongDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, 125 Nashua St, Suite 920, Boston, MA, 02114-1101, USA.
Rain E FreemanCenter for Population Health Research, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, USA.
Krislyn M BoggsDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, 125 Nashua St, Suite 920, Boston, MA, 02114-1101, USA.
Kori S ZachrisonDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, 125 Nashua St, Suite 920, Boston, MA, 02114-1101, USA.
Jingya GaoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, 125 Nashua St, Suite 920, Boston, MA, 02114-1101, USA.
Janice A EspinolaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, 125 Nashua St, Suite 920, Boston, MA, 02114-1101, USA.
Carlos A CamargoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, 125 Nashua St, Suite 920, Boston, MA, 02114-1101, USA. ccamargo@partners.org.ORCID 0000-0002-5071-7654
Massachusetts General Hospital · USUniversity of Montana · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Telepsychiatry has made psychiatric care more accessible to emergency department (ED) patients. To date, most telepsychiatry studies have focused on specific populations or small groups of EDs. This study sought to examine the potential role of telepsychiatry across a wider range of EDs by comparing visit dispositions for psychiatric visits in EDs that did (versus did not) receive telepsychiatry services. ED telepsychiatry service status was identified from the 2016 National ED Inventory-USA and then linked to psychiatric visits from the 2016 New York State Emergency Department Databases/State Inpatient Databases. Unadjusted analyses and multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate associations between an ED's telepsychiatry service status and two clinical outcomes: use of observation services and ED visit disposition. Across all psychiatric ED visits, 712,236 were in EDs without telepsychiatry while 101,025 were in EDs with telepsychiatry. Most (99.8%) visits were in urban EDs. In multivariable logistic regression models, psychiatric visits in EDs with telepsychiatry services had lower odds (adjusted odds ratio 0.30) of using observation services compared to visits in EDs without telepsychiatry. The receipt of ED telepsychiatry is associated with lower usage of observation services for psychiatric visits, likely reducing the amount of time spent in the ED and mitigating the ongoing problem of ED crowding. An overwhelming majority of visits in EDs with telepsychiatry services were in urban hospitals with existing psychiatric services. Factors affecting the delivery and effectiveness of telepsychiatry services to hospitals lacking in psychiatric resources merit further investigation.

Indexed as

PsychiatryTelemedicineEmergency Service, HospitalHumansNew YorkPsychotherapyEmergency departmentObservation servicesPsychiatryTelemedicineVisit disposition

Identifiers

PMID33587257
PMCPMC7882855
OpenAlexW3131026660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.