Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33587238›Full record

ArticleExperimental & applied acarology2021

Development of abamectin resistance in Tetranychus urticae in Australian cotton and the establishment of discriminating doses for T. lambi.

Grant A Herron, Kate L Langfield, Yizhou Chen, Lewis J Wilson

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental & applied acarology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Grant A HerronNew South Wales Department of Primary Industries, Elizabeth MacArthur Agricultural Institute, PMB 4008, Narellan, 2567, Australia. grant.herron@dpi.nsw.gov.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9104-6535
Kate L LangfieldNew South Wales Department of Primary Industries, Elizabeth MacArthur Agricultural Institute, PMB 4008, Narellan, 2567, Australia.
Yizhou ChenNew South Wales Department of Primary Industries, Elizabeth MacArthur Agricultural Institute, PMB 4008, Narellan, 2567, Australia.
Lewis J WilsonCSIRO Agriculture and Food, Locked Bag 59, Narrabri, NSW, 2390, Australia.
New South Wales Department of Primary Industries · AUCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation · AU

Funding

Cotton Research and Development Corporation DAN1507
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the 1980s Tetranychus urticae Koch has dominated Australian cotton due to its ability to develop resistance. Here we give screening data for a range of chemicals tested against T. urticae including abamectin, bifenthrin, diafenthiuron, etoxazole and propargite and speculate why abamectin resistance emerged without warning. Abamectin resistance was not detected in T. urticae in Australian cotton before season 2007-2008 when a few resistant individuals were detected in a single strain. Resistance was detected again in season 2010-2011 and continued to be detected in every subsequent season comprising 80% of strains tested in 2018-2019. We speculate the reason may relate to prophylactic abamectin use to prevent mite flare with Creontiades dilutes Stål mirid sprays. With the introduction of transgenic Bt-cotton, spraying significantly reduced and anecdotally Tetranychus lambi became more abundant. Although T. lambi may now be more common than T. urticae its response to chemical controls is completely unknown. Tetranychus lambi conspecific dose responses were established to support resistance monitoring against abamectin, diafenthiuron and propargite that generated discriminating dose (DD) estimates of 0.0007 g/L abamectin, 0.03 g/L diafenthiuron and 0.7 g/L propargite. These DD were used in season 2018-2019 but resistance was not detected against any product including abamectin. The reason why T. lambi may now dominate despite T. urticae being still resistant is speculated and thought related to the progressive reduction in insecticide use in Australian cotton and/or the changing weed complex in the transgenic cotton era.

Indexed as

MitesTetranychidaeAnimalsAustraliaIvermectinabamectinIvermectinCompetitive displacementFitnessResistanceTetranychus urticae

Identifiers

PMID33587238
OpenAlexW3130468137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.