ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2021
Multivariate statistics for spatial and seasonal quality assessment of water in the Doce River basin, Southeastern Brazil.
Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A decade on: the tailings legacy in Rio Doce water quality.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2026Article
- Retrospective epidemiologic and genomic surveillance of arboviruses in 2023 in Brazil reveals high co-circulation of chikungunya and dengue viruses.BMC medicine · 2024Article
- Assessment of performance indicators for different sizes of water supply systems in Minas Gerais, Brazil.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2021Article
- Insights into spatiotemporal variations of the water quality in Taihu Lake Basin, China.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study employed multivariate statistical techniques in one of the main river basins in Brazil, the Doce River basin, to select and evaluate the most representative parameters of the current water quality aspects, and to group the stations according to the similarity of the selected parameters, for both dry and rainy seasons. Data from 63 qualitative monitoring stations, belonging to the Minas Gerais Water Management Institute network were used, considering 38 parameters for the hydrological year 2017/2018. Principal component analysis (PCA) and hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) were used to reduce the total number of variables and to group stations with similar characteristics, respectively. Using PCA, four principal components were selected as indicators of water quality, explaining the cumulative variance of 68% in the rainy season and 65% in the dry season. The HCA grouped the stations into four groups in the rainy season and three groups in the dry season, showing the influence of seasonality on the grouping of stations. Moreover, the HCA made it possible to differentiate water quality stations located in the headwaters of the basin, in the main river channel, and near urban centers. The results obtained through multivariate statistics proved to be important in understanding the current water quality situation in the basin and can be used to improve the management of water resources because the collection and analysis of all parameters in all monitoring stations require greater availability of financial resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33587192What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.