Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33587156›Full record

Trial reportApplied microbiology and biotechnology2021

Antibacterial and safety tests of a flexible cold atmospheric plasma device for the stimulation of wound healing.

Bouke Boekema, Matthea Stoop, Marcel Vlig, Jos van Liempt, Ana Sobota, Magda Ulrich, Esther Middelkoop

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03007264 (Safety Assessment of Cold Gas Plasma on Intact Skin), which is not on this map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03007264 phase1completednot on this map

Safety Assessment of Cold Gas Plasma on Intact Skin

TypeinterventionalSponsorAssociation of Dutch Burn CentresRan2018 to 2018Enrolled25ConditionsIntact Skin, Contaminant Given to PatientArmsCold Atmospheric Plasma
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. All-Flex Plasma Patch for In Vivo Delivery of Reactive Species.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Penetration depth of cold atmospheric plasma into biological tissue: a review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bouke BoekemaAssociation of Dutch Burn Centres, Zeestraat 29, 1941 AJ, Beverwijk, The Netherlands. bboekema@burns.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9085-6982
Matthea StoopBurn Center, Red Cross Hospital, Beverwijk, The Netherlands.
Marcel VligAssociation of Dutch Burn Centres, Zeestraat 29, 1941 AJ, Beverwijk, The Netherlands.
Jos van LiemptDepartment of Applied Physics, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Ana SobotaDepartment of Applied Physics, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1036-4513
Magda UlrichAssociation of Dutch Burn Centres, Zeestraat 29, 1941 AJ, Beverwijk, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6369-2196
Esther MiddelkoopAssociation of Dutch Burn Centres, Zeestraat 29, 1941 AJ, Beverwijk, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8843-1080
Association of Dutch Burn Centres · NLEindhoven University of Technology · NL

Funding

Nederlandse Brandwonden Stichting 14.200ZonMw 40-41200-98-9189
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cold atmospheric plasma (CAP) devices generate an ionized gas with highly reactive species and electric fields at ambient air pressure and temperature. A flexible dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) was developed as an alternative antimicrobial treatment for chronic wounds. Treatment of Staphylococcus aureus in collagen-elastin matrices with CAP for 2 min resulted in a 4 log reduction. CAP treatment was less effective on S. aureus on dermal samples. CAP did not affect cellular activity or DNA integrity of human dermal samples when used for up to 2 min. Repeated daily CAP treatments for 2 min lowered cellular activity of dermal samples to 80% after 2 to 4 days, but this was not significant. Repeated treatment of ex vivo human burn wound models with CAP for 2 min did not affect re-epithelialization. Intact skin of 25 healthy volunteers was treated with CAP for 3× 20" to determine safety. Although participants reported moderate pain scores (numerical rating scale 3.3), all volunteers considered the procedure to be acceptable. Severe adverse events did not occur. CAP treatment resulted in a temporarily increased local skin temperature (≈3.4°C) and increased erythema. Lowering the plasma power resulted in a significantly lower erythema increase. Good log reduction (2.9) of bacterial load was reached in 14/15 volunteers artificially contaminated with Pseudomonas aeruginosa. This study demonstrated the in vitro and in vivo safety and efficacy in bacterial reduction of a flexible cold plasma device. Trial registration number NCT03007264, January 2, 2017 KEY POINTS: • CAP strongly reduced bacterial numbers both in vitro and in vivo. • Re-epithelialization of burn wound models was not affected by repeated CAP. • CAP treatment of intact skin was well tolerated in volunteers.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsPlasma GasesWound HealingElastinHumansStaphylococcus aureusAnti-Bacterial AgentsElastinPlasma GasesDielectric barrier dischargeHealthy volunteersMethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)Pseudomonas aeruginosaSkin wound model

Identifiers

PMID33587156
PMCPMC7906937
OpenAlexW3132474273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.