Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33587116›Full record

ArticleFEMS microbiology letters2021

Effective methane production from the Japanese weed Gyougi-shiba (Cynodon dactylon) is accomplished by colocalization of microbial communities that assimilate water-soluble and -insoluble fractions.

Shuhei Matsuda, Takashi Ohtsuki

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in FEMS microbiology letters, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 99% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shuhei MatsudaGraduate School of Medicine, Engineering and Agricultural Sciences, University of Yamanashi, Kofu 400-8510, Yamanashi, Japan.
Takashi OhtsukiGraduate School of Medicine, Engineering and Agricultural Sciences, University of Yamanashi, Kofu 400-8510, Yamanashi, Japan.
University of Yamanashi · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Weed, an abundant biomass, is considered unsuitable as a raw material for methane production. There are few reports on the anaerobic digestion of weeds without the addition of other organic wastes. To solve this problem, a methane-producing microbial community with weed as a sole feedstock was established. This study mainly focused on the degree of contribution between water-soluble and -insoluble fractions of the weed to methane production; thus, methane production from both fractions was tested separately. Methane production after 80-day batch cultures with whole weed, water-soluble and water-insoluble fractions was 184.5, 96.8 and 26.5 NmL g-1 dry matter (DM), respectively. The results of 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequence analysis revealed that Proteiniphilum saccharofermentans and several Methanobacterium species commonly dominated all cultures, whereas the population dynamics of minor species differed in every culture. Moreover, the remixed culture of microbial communities adapted to water-soluble and -insoluble fractions recovered methane production (252.4 NmL g-1 DM). Based on these results, it can be strongly inferred that colocalizing the minor species in water-soluble and -insoluble fractions is important for effective methane production.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaBiomassBioreactorsCynodonFatty Acids, VolatileHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationMethanePlant WeedsWaterFatty Acids, VolatileMethaneWaterlignocellulosemethane productionmicrobial communitynanopore sequencingsoluble and insoluble fractionsweed

Identifiers

PMID33587116
PMCPMC7939696
OpenAlexW3132467901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.