Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33586999›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of radiology2021

Dosimetric feasibility of neurovascular bundle-sparing stereotactic body radiotherapy with periprostatic hydrogel spacer for localized prostate cancer to preserve erectile function.

Mark E Hwang, Mark Mayeda, Hiram Shaish, Carl D Elliston, Catherine S Spina, Sven Wenske, Israel Deutsch

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mark E HwangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Wisconsin Health Cancer Center at ProHealth Care, Waukesha, WI, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1753-9382
Mark MayedaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Hiram ShaishDepartment of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Carl D EllistonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Catherine S SpinaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Sven WenskeDepartment of Urology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Israel DeutschDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Columbia University Irving Medical Center · USUniversity of Wisconsin Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe aim to test the hypothesis that neurovascular bundle (NVB) displacement by rectal hydrogel spacer combined with NVB delineation as an organ at risk (OAR) is a feasible method for NVB-sparing stereotactic body radiotherapy.

methodsThirty-five men with low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer who underwent rectal hydrogel spacer placement and pre-, post-spacer prostate MRI studies were treated with prostate SBRT (36.25 Gy in five fractions). A prostate radiologist contoured the NVB on both the pre- and post-spacer T2W MRI sequences that were then registered to the CT simulation scan for NVB-sparing radiation treatment planning. Three SBRT treatment plans were developed for each patient: (1) no NVB sparing, (2) NVB-sparing using pre-spacer MRI, and (3) NVB-sparing using post-spacer MRI. NVB dose constraints include maximum dose 36.25 Gy (100%), V34.4 Gy (95% of dose) <60%, V32Gy <70%, V28Gy <90%.

resultsRectal hydrogel spacer placement shifted NVB contours an average of 3.1 ± 3.4 mm away from the prostate, resulting in a 10% decrease in NVB V34.4 Gy in non-NVB-sparing plans (

conclusionsNVB-sparing SBRT with rectal hydrogel spacer significantly reduces the volume of NVB treated with high-dose radiation. Rectal spacer contributes to this effect through a dosimetrically meaningful displacement of the NVB that may significantly reduce RiED. These results suggest that NVB-sparing SBRT warrants further clinical evaluation. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This is a feasibility study showing that the periprostatic NVBs can be spared high doses of radiation during prostate SBRT using a hydrogel spacer and nerve-sparing treatment planning.

Indexed as

AgedErectile DysfunctionFeasibility StudiesHumansHydrogelsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleOrgans at RiskProstateProstatic NeoplasmsRadiosurgeryRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedRectumRetrospective StudiesHydrogels

Identifiers

PMID33586999
PMCPMC8011244
OpenAlexW3132088177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.