Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33586911›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the International AIDS Society2021

Home-Based Intervention to Test and Start (HITS): a community-randomized controlled trial to increase HIV testing uptake among men in rural South Africa.

Frank C Tanser, Hae-Young Kim, Thulile Mathenjwa, Maryam Shahmanesh, Janet Seeley, Phillippa Matthews, Sally Wyke, Nuala McGrath, Oluwafemi Adeagbo, Benn Sartorius and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 11 institutions in 5 countries.

Frank C TanserAfrica Health Research Institute, Durban, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-9797-0000
Hae-Young KimAfrica Health Research Institute, Durban, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-5124-1555
Thulile MathenjwaAfrica Health Research Institute, Durban, South Africa.
Maryam ShahmaneshAfrica Health Research Institute, Durban, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-7129-8535
Janet SeeleyAfrica Health Research Institute, Durban, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-0583-5272
Phillippa MatthewsAfrica Health Research Institute, Durban, South Africa.
Sally WykeUniversity of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7509-8247
Nuala McGrathAfrica Health Research Institute, Durban, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-1039-0159
Oluwafemi AdeagboAfrica Health Research Institute, Durban, South Africa.
Benn SartoriusSchool of Nursing and Public Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Handurugamage Manisha YapaAfrica Health Research Institute, Durban, South Africa.
Thembelihle ZumaAfrica Health Research Institute, Durban, South Africa.
Anya ZeitlinInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Ann BlandfordUniversity College London Interaction Centre, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3198-7122
Adrian DobraUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7793-2197
Till BärnighausenAfrica Health Research Institute, Durban, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-4182-4212
Africa Health Research Institute · ZALondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBCentre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa · ZAHeidelberg University · DELondon Centre for Nanotechnology · GBSouth Carolina Department of Education · USUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GBUniversity of Washington · USUNSW Sydney · AUZero to Three · US

Funding

Causal Pathways to population health impact of HIV antiretroviral treatmentR01HD084233 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF KWAZULU-NATAL · PI BARNIGHAUSEN, TILL, TANSER, FRANK COURTENEY · 2015 to 2021
$2.3M
Can HIV Hot-Spots be eradicated? An intervention to decrease HIV transmission to young women in rural KwaZulu-Natal South AfricaR01AI124389 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF KWAZULU-NATAL · PI BARNIGHAUSEN, TILL, TANSER, FRANK COURTENEY · 2016 to 2020
$2.1M
Department of Health RP-2017-08-ST2-008 (NM)Medical Research Council MR/P024378/1NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI124389NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD084233Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 201433/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe uptake of HIV testing and linkage to care remains low among men, contributing to high HIV incidence in women in South Africa. We conducted the "Home-Based Intervention to Test and Start" (HITS) in a 2x2 factorial cluster randomized controlled trial in one of the World's largest ongoing HIV cohorts in rural South Africa aimed at enhancing both intrinsic and extrinsic motivations for HIV testing.

methodsBetween February and December 2018, in the uMkhanyakude district of KwaZulu-Natal, we randomly assigned 45 communities (clusters) (n = 13,838 residents) to one of the four arms: (i) financial incentives for home-based HIV testing and linkage to care (R50 [$3] food voucher each); (ii) male-targeted HIV-specific decision support application, called EPIC-HIV; (iii) both financial incentives and male-targeted HIV-specific decision support application and (iv) standard of care (SoC). EPIC-HIV was developed to encourage and serve as an intrinsic motivator for HIV testing and linkage to care, and individually offered to men via a tablet device. Financial incentives were offered to both men and women. Here we report the effect of the interventions on uptake of home-based HIV testing among men. Intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis was performed using modified Poisson regression with adjustment for clustering of standard errors at the cluster levels.

resultsAmong all 13,838 men ≥ 15 years living in the 45 communities, the overall population coverage during a single round of home-based HIV testing was 20.7%. The uptake of HIV testing was 27.5% (683/2481) in the financial incentives arm, 17.1% (433/2534) in the EPIC-HIV arm, 26.8% (568/2120) in the arm receiving both interventions and 17.8% in the SoC arm. The probability of HIV testing increased substantially by 55% in the financial incentives arm (risk ratio (RR)=1.55, 95% CI: 1.31 to 1.82, p < 0.001) and 51% in the arm receiving both interventions (RR = 1.51, 95% CI: 1.21 to 1.87 p < 0.001), compared to men in the SoC arm. The probability of HIV testing did not significantly differ in the EPIC-HIV arm (RR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.76 to 1.20, p = 0.70).

conclusionsThe provision of a small financial incentive acted as a powerful extrinsic motivator substantially increasing the uptake of home-based HIV testing among men in rural South Africa. In contrast, the counselling and testing application which was designed to encourage and serve as an intrinsic motivator to test for HIV did not increase the uptake of home-based testing.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchFemaleGift GivingHIV InfectionsHIV TestingHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedMotivationRural PopulationSelf CareSouth AfricaTelemedicinecounsellingfinancial incentivesHome-based HIV testingmenmHealthrandomized controlled trialSouth Africa

Identifiers

PMID33586911
PMCPMC7883477
OpenAlexW3129814013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.