Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33586767›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2021

Behavioral and Genomic Sensory Adaptations Underlying the Pest Activity of Drosophila suzukii.

Sylvia M Durkin, Mahul Chakraborty, Antoine Abrieux, Kyle M Lewald, Alice Gadau, Nicolas Svetec, Junhui Peng, Miriam Kopyto, Christopher B Langer, Joanna C Chiu and 2 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Receptor sequence divergence, gain, loss, duplication, and neofunctionalization drive olfactory adaptation inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Genomic plasticity drives olfactory adaptation in a pest fly.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. iScience · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. eLife · 2024
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Sylvia M DurkinLaboratory of Evolutionary Genetics and Genomics, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA.
Mahul ChakrabortyDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.
Antoine AbrieuxDepartment of Entomology and Nematology, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
Kyle M LewaldDepartment of Entomology and Nematology, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
Alice GadauLaboratory of Evolutionary Genetics and Genomics, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA.
Nicolas SvetecLaboratory of Evolutionary Genetics and Genomics, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9617-2752
Junhui PengLaboratory of Evolutionary Genetics and Genomics, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA.
Miriam KopytoLaboratory of Evolutionary Genetics and Genomics, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA.
Christopher B LangerLaboratory of Evolutionary Genetics and Genomics, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA.
Joanna C ChiuDepartment of Entomology and Nematology, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
J J EmersonDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.
Li ZhaoLaboratory of Evolutionary Genetics and Genomics, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6776-1996

Funding

Genetics and Cell BiologyT32GM066699 · NIGMS · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI STRICKLAND, SIDNEY · 2004 to 2021
$7.6M
The genetic and epigenetic mechanisms of phenotypic innovationhttps://apps.era.nih.gov/gm/reportCheckList.do?applicationID=9798249R35GM133780 · NIGMS · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI Li Zhao · 2019 to 2026
$3.5M
Structural variation population size and the evolution of genome complexityR01GM123303 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI EMERSON, JAMES JORDAN · 2017 to 2021
$1.5M
Evolutionary and functional consequences of structural genetic variation in DrosophilaK99GM129411 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI CHAKRABORTY, MAHUL · 2019 to 2021
$145k
NIGMS NIH HHS K99 GM129411NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM123303NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM133780NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM066699
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studying how novel phenotypes originate and evolve is fundamental to the field of evolutionary biology as it allows us to understand how organismal diversity is generated and maintained. However, determining the basis of novel phenotypes is challenging as it involves orchestrated changes at multiple biological levels. Here, we aim to overcome this challenge by using a comparative species framework combining behavioral, gene expression, and genomic analyses to understand the evolutionary novel egg-laying substrate-choice behavior of the invasive pest species Drosophila suzukii. First, we used egg-laying behavioral assays to understand the evolution of ripe fruit oviposition preference in D. suzukii compared with closely related species D. subpulchrella and D. biarmipes as well as D. melanogaster. We show that D. subpulchrella and D. biarmipes lay eggs on both ripe and rotten fruits, suggesting that the transition to ripe fruit preference was gradual. Second, using two-choice oviposition assays, we studied how D. suzukii, D. subpulchrella, D. biarmipes, and D. melanogaster differentially process key sensory cues distinguishing ripe from rotten fruit during egg-laying. We found that D. suzukii's preference for ripe fruit is in part mediated through a species-specific preference for stiff substrates. Last, we sequenced and annotated a high-quality genome for D. subpulchrella. Using comparative genomic approaches, we identified candidate genes involved in D. suzukii's ability to seek out and target ripe fruits. Our results provide detail to the stepwise evolution of pest activity in D. suzukii, indicating important cues used by this species when finding a host, and the molecular mechanisms potentially underlying their adaptation to a new ecological niche.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionGenome, InsectOvipositionSensationAdaptation, BiologicalAnimalsCuesDrosophilaFemaleFruitIntroduced SpeciesSelection, GeneticSensory Receptor CellsSpecies SpecificityDrosophila subpulchrellaDrosophila suzukiiegg-layingnovel behaviorpopulation genomicssensory adaptation

Identifiers

PMID33586767
PMCPMC8136512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.