Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33586323›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2021

Additional radiotherapy to breast-conserving surgery is an optional treatment for de novo stage IV breast cancer: A population-based analysis.

Jun Wang, Shi-Ping Yang, Ping Zhou, Chen-Lu Lian, Jian Lei, Li Hua, Zhen-Yu He, San-Gang Wu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Patterns ofFrontiers in endocrinology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jun WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, People's Republic of China.
Shi-Ping YangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hainan General Hospital (Hainan Affiliated Hospital of Medical University), Haikou, Hainan, People's Republic of China.
Ping ZhouDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, People's Republic of China.
Chen-Lu LianDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, People's Republic of China.
Jian LeiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, People's Republic of China.
Li HuaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, People's Republic of China.
Zhen-Yu HeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-1402-8963
San-Gang WuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-0556-2614
First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University · CNHainan General Hospital · CNSun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe aim to assess the value of locoregional treatment (LRT) including breast-conserving surgery (BCS), mastectomy (MAST), and radiotherapy (RT) in patients with de novo stage IV breast cancer.

methodsPatients with de novo stage IV breast cancer were retrospectively identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database between 2004 and 2014. Kaplan-Meier analysis, log-rank tests, propensity score matching (PSM), and the multivariate Cox proportional model were used for statistical analysis.

resultsA total of 5798 patients were identified including 849 (14.6%), 763 (13.2%), 2338 (40.3%), and 1848 (31.9%) who received BCS alone, BCS+RT, MAST alone, and MAST+RT, respectively. The proportions of receiving BCS decreased from 35.9% in 2004 to 26.2% in 2014 (p = 0.002), and the probability of patients receiving MAST increased from 64.1% in 2004 to 74.8% in 2014 (p = 0.002). Before PSM, there was a significant difference in breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) among the treatment arms. Patients who received RT had better BCSS, the 5-year BCSS was 40.5%, 52.3%, 41.5%, and 47.7% in patients treated with BCS alone, BCS+RT, MAST alone, and MAST+RT, respectively (p < 0.001). In the PSM cohort, patients treated with BCS alone had lower 5-year BCSS compared to those treated with BCS+RT (43.9% and 52.1%, p = 0.002). However, there were comparable 5-year BCSS between BCS+RT and MAST alone groups (51.3% and 50.1%, p = 0.872), and BCS+RT and MAST+RT cohorts (51.5% and 55.7%, p = 0.333). Similar results were confirmed in multivariate analysis.

conclusionsPostoperative RT improves BCSS in patients with de novo stage IV breast cancer, and BCS+RT shows a non-inferior outcome compared to MAST+RT. BCS+RT may be the optimal local management of de novo stage IV breast cancer.

Indexed as

MastectomyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMastectomy, SegmentalMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPropensity ScoreProportional Hazards ModelsRadiotherapy, AdjuvantRetrospective StudiesSEER Programbreast-conserving surgerymastectomymetastatic breast cancerradiotherapysurvival

Identifiers

PMID33586323
PMCPMC7940213
OpenAlexW3129595114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.