Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33586274›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2021

Four Cycles of Etoposide plus Cisplatin for Patients with Good-Risk Advanced Germ Cell Tumors.

Samuel A Funt, Deaglan J McHugh, Stephanie Tsai, Andrea Knezevic, Devon O'Donnell, Sujata Patil, Deborah Silber, Maria Bromberg, Maryann Carousso, Victor E Reuter and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Use of Sodium Thiosulfate as an Otoprotectant in Patients With Cancer Treated With Platinum Compounds: A Review of the Literature.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Samuel A FuntGenitourinary Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7235-6319
Deaglan J McHughGenitourinary Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA.
Stephanie TsaiGenitourinary Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA.
Andrea KnezevicDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA.
Devon O'DonnellGenitourinary Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA.
Sujata PatilDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA.
Deborah SilberGenitourinary Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA.
Maria BrombergGenitourinary Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA.
Maryann CaroussoGenitourinary Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA.
Victor E ReuterDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA.
Brett S CarverDepartment of Urology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA.
Joel SheinfeldDepartment of Urology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA.
Robert J MotzerGenitourinary Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA.
Dean F BajorinGenitourinary Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA.
George J BoslGenitourinary Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA.
Darren R FeldmanGenitourinary Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2424-4635
Cornell University · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Summer research experiences for medical students supervised by faculty mentorsR25CA020449 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Charlotte Eielson Ariyan · 1985 to 2026
$6.2M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R25 CA020449
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommends either three cycles of bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin or four cycles of etoposide and cisplatin (EPx4) as initial chemotherapy for the treatment of good-risk germ cell tumors (GCTs). To assess the response, toxicity, and survival outcomes of EPx4, we analyzed our experience. MATERIAL AND

methodsResponse and survival outcomes, selected toxicities, and adherence to chemotherapy dose and schedule were assessed in patients with good-risk GCT who received EPx4 at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center between 1982 and 2016. The results were compared with our past results and published data.

resultsBetween 1982 and 2016, 944 patients with GCT were treated with EPx4, 289 who were previously reported plus 655 treated between January 2000 and August 2016. A favorable response was achieved in 928 of 944 patients (98.3%). Five-year progression-free, disease-specific, and overall survival rates were 93.9%, 98.6%, and 97.9%, respectively. Median follow-up was 7.3 years (range, 2.8 months to 35.5 years). Viable, nonteratomatous malignant GCT was present in 3.5% of 432 postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection specimens from patients with nonseminomatous GCT. Febrile neutropenia and thromboembolic events occurred in 16.0% and 8.9%, respectively, with one treatment-related death. In the more recent 655-patient cohort, full-dose EPx4 was administered to 631 (96.3%), with deviations from planned treatment driven mainly by vascular (n = 13), hematologic (n = 11), renal (n = 7), or infectious (n = 5) events.

conclusionEPx4 is highly effective and well tolerated in patients with good-risk GCTs and remains a standard of care. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Four cycles of etoposide and cisplatin (EPx4) is a standard-of-care regimen for all patients with good-risk germ cell tumors with a favorable response rate and disease-specific survival of 98%. Full-dose administration of etoposide and cisplatin and complete resection of residual disease lead to optimal outcomes. EPx4 should be the recommended regimen in active smokers, patients with reduced or borderline kidney function, and patients aged 50 years or older, which are patient groups at increased risk for bleomycin pulmonary toxicity. Because of a risk of acquired severe pulmonary illness, EPx4 may also be favored for patients who vape or use e-cigarettes and during ongoing transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.

Indexed as

COVID-19Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsNeoplasms, Germ Cell and EmbryonalTesticular NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBleomycinCisplatinEtoposideHumansMaleSARS-CoV-2BleomycinCisplatinEtoposideCisplatinEtoposideGerm cell tumorStandard of careTesticular neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID33586274
PMCPMC8176973
OpenAlexW3130267677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.