ArticleStatistics in medicine2021
Learning latent heterogeneity for type 2 diabetes patients using longitudinal health markers in electronic health records.
Article in Statistics in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Can Real-World Data From Hospital Information Systems Be Directly Utilized for Efficacy Studies: An Analysis of Data Time Points.Journal of evidence-based medicine · 2025Article
- Opportunistic screening of type 2 diabetes with deep metric learning using electronic health records.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Estimating individualized treatment rules for multicategory type 2 diabetes treatments using electronic health records.Statistics and its interface · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Electronic health records (EHRs) from type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients consist of longitudinally and sparsely measured health markers at clinical encounters. Our goal is to use such data to learn latent patterns that can inform patient's health status related to T2D while accounting for challenges in retrospectively collected EHRs. To handle challenges such as correlated longitudinal measurements, irregular and informative encounter times, and mixed marker types, we propose multivariate generalized linear models to learn latent patient subgroups. In our model, covariate effects were time-dependent and latent Gaussian processes were introduced to model between-marker correlations over time. Using inferred latent processes, we integrated the irregularly measured health markers of mixed types into composite scores and applied hierarchical clustering to learn latent subgroup structures among T2D patients. Application to an EHR dataset of T2D patients showed different trends of age, sex, and race effects on hypertension/high blood pressure, total cholesterol, glycated hemoglobin, high-density lipoprotein, and medications. The associations among these markers varied over time during the study window. Clustering results revealed four subgroups, each with distinct health status. The same patterns were further confirmed using new EHR records of the same cohort. We developed a novel latent model to integrate longitudinal health markers in EHRs and characterize patient latent heterogeneities. Analysis indicated that there were distinct subgroups of T2D patients, suggesting that effective healthcare managements for these patients should be performed separately for each subgroup.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.