SynthesisEnvironmental science and pollution research international2021
Insights into conventional and recent technologies for arsenic bioremediation: A systematic review.
Synthesis in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 130 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparing the efficiency of living and non-living macroalgae biomass in removing classical and emergent contaminants from complex multi-element mixtures.Bioprocess and biosystems engineering · 2026Article
- Mechanisms of Arsenic Interaction inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Isolation of a potentially arsenic-resistant Halomonas elongata strain (ml10562) from hypersaline systems in the Peruvian Andes, Cusco.PloS one · 2025Article
- The arsenic bioremediation using genetically engineered microbial strains on aquatic environments: An updated overview.Heliyon · 2024Review
- Synthetic bacteria designed using ars operons: a promising solution for arsenic biosensing and bioremediation.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2024Review
- Article
- Biochar co-compost increases the productivity ofFrontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Alleviating arsenic stress affecting the growth ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Perspectives of pteridophytes microbiome for bioremediation in agricultural applications.Open life sciences · 2024Review
- Plant Growth Regulators with a Balanced Supply of Nutrients Enhance the Phytoextraction Efficiency ofACS omega · 2023Article
- In silico comparative structural and functional analysis of arsenite methyltransferase from bacteria, fungi, fishes, birds, and mammals.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2023Article
- Biotechnology Advances in Bioremediation of Arsenic: A Review.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Heavy Metal Pollution in the Environment and Its Impact on Health: Exploring Green Technology for Remediation.Environmental health insights · 2023Review
- Bacterial Arsenic Metabolism and Its Role in Arsenic Bioremediation.Current microbiology · 2022Review
- Article
- Interactions with Arsenic: Mechanisms of Toxicity and Cellular Resistance in Eukaryotic Microorganisms.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Review
- Plant growth regulators and EDTA improve phytoremediation potential and antioxidant response of Dysphania ambrosioides (L.) Mosyakin & Clemants in a Cd-spiked soil.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021Article
- Histological and proteome analyses of3 Biotech · 2021Article
- Co-composted Biochar Enhances Growth, Physiological, and Phytostabilization Efficiency ofFrontiers in plant science · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Arsenic (As) bioremediation has been an economical and sustainable approach, being practiced widely under several As-contaminated environments. Bioremediation of As involves the use of bacteria, fungi, yeast, plants, and genetically modified organisms for detoxification/removal of As from the contaminated site. The understanding of multi-factorial biological components involved in these approaches is complex and more and more efforts are on their way to make As bioremediation economical and efficient. In this regard, we systematically reviewed the recent literature (n=200) from the last two decades regarding As bioremediation potential of conventional and recent technologies including genetically modified plants for phytoremediation and integrated approaches. Also, the responsible mechanisms behind different approaches have been identified. From the literature, it was found that As bioremediation through biosorption, bioaccumulation, phytoextraction, and volatilization involving As-resistant microbes has proved a very successful technology. However, there are various pathways of As tolerance of which the mechanisms have not been fully understood. Recently, phytosuction separation technology has been introduced and needs further exploration. Also, integrated approaches like phytobial, constructed wetlands using As-resistant bacteria with plant growth-promoting activities have not been extensively studied. It is speculated that the integrated bioremediation approaches with practical applicability and reliability would prove most promising for As remediation. Further technological advancements would help explore the identified research gaps in different approaches and lead us toward sustainability and perfection in As bioremediation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.