Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33586089›Full record

ArticleUpdates in surgery2021

Age and comorbidities do not affect short-term outcomes after laparoscopic rectal cancer resection in elderly patients. A multi-institutional cohort study in 287 patients.

Roberto Peltrini, Nicola Imperatore, Filippo Carannante, Diego Cuccurullo, Gabriella Teresa Capolupo, Umberto Bracale, Marco Caricato, Francesco Corcione

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Updates in surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Minimally Invasive Surgery Deserts: Is There a Role for Robotic Assisted Surgery?JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Roberto PeltriniDepartment of Public Health, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy. roberto.peltrini@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0445-2269
Nicola ImperatoreDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Filippo CarannanteColorectal Surgery Unit, Campus BioMedico University Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Diego CuccurulloGeneral Surgery Unit, Monaldi Hospital, Naples, Italy.
Gabriella Teresa CapolupoColorectal Surgery Unit, Campus BioMedico University Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Umberto BracaleDepartment of Public Health, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Marco CaricatoColorectal Surgery Unit, Campus BioMedico University Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Francesco CorcioneDepartment of Public Health, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Università Campus Bio-Medico · ITUniversity of Naples Federico II · ITFederico II University Hospital · ITOspedale Antonio Cardarelli · ITOspedale Monaldi · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Postoperative complications and mortality rates after rectal cancer surgery are higher in elderly than in non-elderly patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether, like in open surgery, age and comorbidities affect postoperative outcomes limiting the benefits of a laparoscopic approach. Between April 2011 and July 2020, data of 287 patients with rectal cancer submitted to laparoscopic rectal resection from different institutions were collected in an electronic database and were categorized into two groups: < 75 years and ≥ 75 years of age. Perioperative data and short-term outcomes were compared between these groups. Risk factors for postoperative complications were determined on multivariate analysis, including age groups and previous comorbidities as variables. Seventy-seven elderly patients had both higher ASA scores (p < 0.001) and cardiovascular disease rates (p = 0.02) compared with 210 non-elderly patients. There were no significative differences between groups in terms of overall postoperative complications (p = 0.3), number of patients with complications (p = 0.2), length of stay (p = 0.2) and death during hospitalization (p = 0.9). The only independent variables correlated with postoperative morbidity were male gender (OR 2.56; 95% CI 1.53-3.68, p < 0.01) and low-medium localization of the tumor (OR 2.12; 75% CI 1.43-4.21, p < 0.01). Although older people are more frail patients, short-term postoperative outcomes in patients ≥ 75 years of age were similar to those of younger patients after laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. Elderly patients benefit from laparoscopic rectal resection as well as non-elderly patient, despite advanced age and comorbidities.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyRectal NeoplasmsAgedCohort StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRectumRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeElderlyLaparoscopyPostoperative complicationsRectal cancerShort-term outcomesSurgery

Identifiers

PMID33586089
PMCPMC8005386
OpenAlexW3131322948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.