ArticleDysphagia2022
Clinical Usefulness of the Korean Version of the Dysphagia Handicap Index: Reliability, Validity, and Role as a Screening Test.
Article in Dysphagia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Psychometric Properties of Dysphagia Handicap Index Scale for Older Adults with Oropharyngeal Dysphagia in China.Dysphagia · 2025Article
- Impact of Modified Diet, Swallowing Exercises, and Electrostimulation on Quality of Life of Older Patients Suffering from Oropharyngeal Dysphagia.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
- Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Italian Version of the Dysphagia Handicap Index (I-DHI).Dysphagia · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to measure the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the Dysphagia Handicap Index (K-DHI) and evaluate its diagnostic efficacy for predicting aspiration. We enrolled 104 patients with dysphagia symptoms (D group) and 88 controls (ND group). Among controls, there were 43 patients without dysphagia symptoms (ND patient group). All subjects completed the K-DHI survey. The D and ND group patients underwent the Gugging Swallowing Screen (GUSS) and videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS). Two weeks later, the D group completed the second session of the K-DHI survey. The internal consistency of the K-DHI was good to excellent (Cronbach's α: 0.79-0.95). The test-retest reliability of the K-DHI survey was also high (interclass correlation coefficient = 0.88). There were moderate correlations between the K-DHI and GUSS (r = - 0.65, p < 0.001) as well as findings of VFSS-videofluoroscopic dysphagia scale (r = 0.55, p < 0.001) and American Speech-Language-Hearing Association National Outcome Measurement System swallowing scale (r = - 0.55, p < 0.001). For predicting aspiration, the K-DHI cutoff value was 11 (sensitivity, 0.82; specificity, 0.72; positive predictive value, 0.34; and negative predictive value, 0.96). K-DHI ≥ 11 [odds ratio (OR), 6.43; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) (1.87-22.16); p = 0.003] and GUSS ≤ 15 [OR 4.73; 95% CI (1.59-14.07); p = 0.005] were independent risk factors for aspiration on VFSS. The K-DHI is a reliable and valid self-reporting instrument for evaluating patient's quality of life associated with dysphagia among the Korean language population. It is also useful for the screening of aspiration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33586044What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.