ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2021
Population inference based on mitochondrial DNA control region data by the nearest neighbors algorithm.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Population and geographic assignment are frequently undertaken using DNA sequences on the mitochondrial genome. Assignment to broad continental populations is common, although finer resolution to subpopulations can be less accurate due to shared genetic ancestry at a local level and members of different ancestral subpopulations cohabiting the same geographic area. This study reports on the accuracy of population and subpopulation assignment by using the sequence data obtained from the 3070 mitochondrial genomes and applying the K-nearest neighbors (KNN) algorithm. These data also included training samples used for continental and population assignment comprised of 1105 Europeans (including Austria, France, Germany, Spain, and England and Caucasian countries), 374 Africans (including North and East Africa and non-specific area (Pan-Africa)), and 1591 Asians (including Japan, Philippines, and Taiwan). Subpopulations included in this study were 1153 mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) control region sequences from 12 subpopulations in Taiwan (including Han, Hakka, Ami, Atayal, Bunun, Paiwan, Puyuma, Rukai, Saisiyat, Tsou, Tao, and Pingpu). Additionally, control region sequence data from a further 50 samples, obtained from the Sigma Company, were included after they were amplified and sequenced. These additional 50 samples acted as the "testing samples" to verify the accuracy of the population. In this study, based on genetic distances as genetic metric, we used the KNN algorithm and the K-weighted-nearest neighbors (KWNN) algorithm weighted by genetic distance to classify individuals into continental populations, and subpopulations within the same continent. Accuracy results of ethnic inferences at the level of continental populations and of subpopulations among KNN and KWNN algorithms were obtained. The training sample set achieved an overall accuracy of 99 to 82% for assignment to their continental populations with K values from 1 to 101. Population assignment for subpopulations with K assignments from 1 to 5 reached an accuracy of 77 to 54%. Four out of 12 Taiwanese populations returned an accuracy of assignment of over 60%, Ami (66%), Atayal (67%), Saisiyat (66%), and Tao (80%). For the testing sample set, results of ethnic prediction for continental populations with recommended K values as 5, 10, and 35, based on results of the training sample set, achieved overall an accuracy of 100 to 94%. This study provided an accurate method in population assignment for not only continental populations but also subpopulations, which can be useful in forensic and anthropological studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33586030What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.