Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33586012›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2021

The comparison of FOLFOX regimens with different doses of 5-FU for the adjuvant treatment of colorectal cancer: a multicenter study.

Nadiye Akdeniz, Muhammet Ali Kaplan, Doğan Uncu, Mevlüde İnanç, Serap Kaya, Faysal Dane, Mehmet Küçüköner, Ayşe Demirci, Mehmet Bilici, Ayşe Gök Durnalı and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Anti-Colorectal Cancer Activity ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Value of MSCT plus MRI in the Detection of Colon Cancer.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Nadiye AkdenizDepartment of Medical Oncology, Adiyaman Training and Research Hospital, 02100, Adiyaman, Turkey. nadiyeakdeniz21@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4597-9721
Muhammet Ali KaplanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dicle University Faculty of Medicine, Diyarbakır, Turkey.
Doğan UncuDepartment of Medical Oncology, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Mevlüde İnançDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erciyes University Faculty of Medicine, Kayseri, Turkey.
Serap KayaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Marmara University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Faysal DaneDepartment of Medical Oncology, Marmara University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Mehmet KüçükönerDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dicle University Faculty of Medicine, Diyarbakır, Turkey.
Ayşe DemirciDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sakarya University Faculty of Medicine, Sakarya, Turkey.
Mehmet BiliciDepartment of Medical Oncology, Atatürk University Faculty of Medicine, Erzurum, Turkey.
Ayşe Gök DurnalıDepartment of Medical Oncology, Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Lokman KoralDepartment of Medical Oncology, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University Faculty of Medicine, Çanakkale, Turkey.
Mehmet Ali Nahit ŞendurDepartment of Medical Oncology, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Cihan ErolDepartment of Medical Oncology, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Esma TürkmenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Derince Training and Research Hospital, Izmit, Turkey.
Ömer Fatih ÖlmezDepartment of Medical Oncology, Medipol University Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.
Özgür AçıkgözDepartment of Medical Oncology, Medipol University Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.
Şahin LaçinDepartment of Medical Oncology, Yeditepe University Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey.
Hayriye ŞahinliDepartment of Medical Oncology, Diskapi Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Zuhat UrakçıDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dicle University Faculty of Medicine, Diyarbakır, Turkey.
Abdurrahman IşıkdoğanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dicle University Faculty of Medicine, Diyarbakır, Turkey.
Dicle University · TRMemorial Ankara Hospital · TRIstanbul Medipol University · TRMarmara University · TRAdıyaman University · TRAtatürk University · TRÇanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi · TRDışkapı Yıldırım Beyazıt Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TRErciyes University · TRSakarya University · TRYeditepe University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe aim to compare the efficiency and toxicity of three different 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) administration types in 5-FU, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) combination treatment for adjuvant therapy in colorectal cancer (CRC).

methodsFive hundred and seventy patients with stage III colorectal carcinoma who received different FOLFOX regimens after curative resection were included. Patients were divided into three groups as FOLFOX-4, modified FOLFOX-6 (mFOLFOX-6), and mFOLFOX-4 for comparison of toxicity and disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) times.

resultsThree-year DFS rates for FOLFOX-4, mFOLFOX-6, and mFOLFOX-4 groups were 65%, 72%, and 72%, respectively. Five-year OS rates for FOLFOX-4, mFOLFOX-6, and mFOLFOX-4 groups were 69%, 75%, and 67%, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the three treatment groups in terms of DFS and OS (p = 0.079, and p = 0.147, respectively). Among grade 1-2 adverse events (AE), thrombocytopenia, neuropathy, and stomatitis were more common in the mFOLFOX-6-treated group. The frequency of grade 1-2 nausea and vomiting were similar in mFOLFOX-6 (36.3% and 24%, respectively) and mFOLFOX-4 (32.4% and 24.7%, respectively) groups but were higher than that in the FOLFOX-4 (19.5% and 11.3%, respectively) group. Among the most common grade 3-4 AE, neutropenia (53.4%, 9%, and 13.5%, respectively) and diarrhea (10.5%, 2.2%, and 2.4, respectively) were more common in FOLFOX-4. The rate of anemia and febrile neutropenia was similar in treatment groups (p = 0.063, and p = 0.210, respectively).

conclusionIn the adjuvant treatment of stage III CRC patients, three different 5-FU administration types in FOLFOX combination treatment can be used with similar efficiency and manageable toxicity.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsOrganoplatinum CompoundsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsFluorouracilHumansLeucovorinFluorouracilLeucovorinOrganoplatinum CompoundsAdjuvant chemotherapyColorectal cancer; FOLFOX regimensStage III

Identifiers

PMID33586012
OpenAlexW3132528992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.