ArticleEuropean radiology2021
Quantification of intracranial arterial stenotic degree evaluated by high-resolution vessel wall imaging and time-of-flight MR angiography: reproducibility, and diagnostic agreement with DSA.
Article in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Residual Inflammatory Risk and Intracranial Atherosclerosis Plaque Vulnerability: Insights From High-Resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Journal of stroke · 2025Article
- High resolution 7T MR imaging in characterizing culprit intracranial atherosclerotic plaques.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025Article
- High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging features of time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography signal loss and its relevance to ischemic stroke.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- Review
- Assessment of paclitaxel drug-coated balloon angioplasty for intracranial atherosclerotic disease based on high-resolution vessel wall magnetic resonance imaging.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2024Article
- The incomplete circle of Willis is associated with vulnerable intracranial plaque features and acute ischemic stroke.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2023Article
- Burden of dilated perivascular spaces in patients with moyamoya disease and moyamoya syndrome is related to middle cerebral artery stenosis.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
- Development and validation of visual grading system for stenosis in intracranial atherosclerotic disease on time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography.European radiology · 2022Observational
- Advanced targeted nanomedicines for vulnerable atherosclerosis plaque imaging and their potential clinical implications.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe purpose of this study was to compare the reproducibility and diagnostic agreement of high-resolution vessel wall imaging (HR-VWI) and time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography (TOF-MRA) with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) to evaluate intracranial arterial stenosis.
methodsWe retrospectively enrolled patients who underwent HR-VWI and TOF-MRA with suspected intracranial artery disease and had DSA results from our institutional imaging database. Two neuroradiologists separately and independently evaluated anonymous image data for the stenotic lesions. DSA was analyzed by two neurointerventionalists and it served as a standard criterion. The reproducibility of these two MR techniques was determined by the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). The diagnostic agreement to DSA was assessed by the concordance correlation coefficients (CCCs).
resultsA total of 246 lesions from 106 individuals were analyzed for stenotic degrees. The total intra-observer and inter-observer reproducibility of HR-VWI was excellent for identifying stenosis and better than of TOF-MRA. The overall concordance of HR-VWI with DSA was excellent with CCC = 0.932, whereas TOF-MRA was 0.694. In addition, HR-VWI could provide additional vessel wall information.
conclusionsHR-VWI has more advantages over TOF-MRA, such as better reproducibilities and diagnostic agreements with DSA to analyze intracranial arterial stenosis. It provides additional information that helps in clinical diagnosis and management. KEY POINTS: • High-resolution vessel wall imaging can assess intracranial arterial stenosis with a better reproducibility than TOF-MRA and has a higher diagnostic agreement with DSA. • High-resolution vessel wall imaging had a higher diagnostic agreement with DSA compared with TOF-MRA. • Apart from evaluating vascular stenosis, HR-VWI provided additional vessel wall information to help in clinical diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.