Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33585965›Full record

ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2021

Variability in utilization and techniques of pelvic floor imaging: findings of the SAR pelvic floor dysfunction disease-focused panel.

Milana Flusberg, Yin Xi, Kedar Jambhekar, Simin Bahrami, Victoria Chernyak, Neeraj Lalwani, Mark Lockhart, Roopa Ram, Julia R Fielding, Rania Farouk El Sayed and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Dynamic ileal pouch emptying studies.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Milana FlusbergWestchester Medical Center, 100 Woods Rd, Valhalla, NY, 10595, USA. mflusberg@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8909-8627
Yin XiUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA.
Kedar JambhekarUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Simin BahramiUniversity of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Victoria ChernyakMontefiore Medical Center, New York, USA.
Neeraj LalwaniWake Forest University Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, USA.
Mark LockhartUniversity of Alabama Medical Center, Birmingham, USA.
Roopa RamUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Julia R FieldingUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA.
Rania Farouk El SayedCairo University Hospitals, Cairo, Egypt.
Gaurav KhatriUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA.
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · USAtrium Health Wake Forest Baptist · USCairo University hospitals · EGMontefiore Medical Center · USUniversity of Alabama · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USWestchester Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pelvic floor disorders are common and can negatively impact quality of life. Imaging of patients with pelvic floor disorders has been extremely heterogeneous between institutions due in part to variations in clinical expectations, technical considerations, and radiologist experience. In order to assess variations in utilization and technique of pelvic floor imaging across practices, the society of abdominal radiology (SAR) disease-focused panel on pelvic floor dysfunction developed and administered an online survey to radiologists including the SAR membership. Results of the survey were compared with published recommendations for pelvic floor imaging to identify areas in need of further standardization. MRI was the most commonly reported imaging technique for pelvic floor imaging followed by fluoroscopic defecography. Ultrasound was only used by a small minority of responding radiologists. The survey responses demonstrated variability in imaging utilization, patient referral patterns, imaging protocols, patient education, and interpretation and reporting of pelvic floor imaging examinations. This survey highlighted inconsistencies in technique between institutions as well as potential gaps in knowledge that should be addressed to standardize evaluation of patients with pelvic floor dysfunction.

Indexed as

Pelvic Floor DisordersRadiologyDefecographyHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPelvic FloorQuality of LifeMagnetic resonance defecographyPelvic floorProlapse

Identifiers

PMID33585965
OpenAlexW3132881899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.