Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33585916›Full record

ArticleClinical chemistry2021

Development and Validation of Measurement Traceability for In Situ Immunoassays.

Emina E Torlakovic, Seshi R Sompuram, Kodela Vani, Lili Wang, Anika K Schaedle, Paul C DeRose, Steven A Bogen

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical chemistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. A Consortium for Analytic Standardization in Immunohistochemistry.Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Emina E TorlakovicCanadian Biomarker Quality Assurance, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Seshi R SompuramBoston Cell Standards LLC, Boston, MA, USA.
Kodela VaniBoston Cell Standards LLC, Boston, MA, USA.
Lili WangBiosystems and Biomaterials Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
Anika K SchaedleBoston Cell Standards LLC, Boston, MA, USA.
Paul C DeRoseBiosystems and Biomaterials Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
Steven A BogenBoston Cell Standards LLC, Boston, MA, USA.
National Institute of Standards and Technology · USUniversity of Saskatchewan · CA

Funding

Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute (Pilot Supplement)UL1TR002544 · NCATS · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI SELKER, HARRY P. · 2018 to 2022
$50.2M
Regulatory Validation of Standardized Clinical Laboratory Immunohistochemistry ControlsR44CA213476 · NCI · BOSTON CELL STANDARDS INC · PI BOGEN, STEVEN A · 2017 to 2018
$1.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002544NCI NIH HHS R44 CA213476
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImmunoassays for protein analytes measured in situ support a $2 billion laboratory testing industry that suffers from significant interlaboratory disparities, affecting patient treatment. The root cause is that immunohistochemical testing lacks the generally accepted tools for analytic standardization, including reference standards and traceable units of measure. Until now, the creation of these tools has represented an insoluble technical hurdle.

methodsWe address the need with a new concept in metrology-that is, linked traceability. Rather than calculating analyte concentration directly, which has proven too variable, we calculate concentration by measuring an attached fluorescein, traceable to NIST Standard Reference Material 1934, a fluorescein standard.

resultsFor validation, newly developed estrogen receptor (ER) calibrators were deployed in tandem with an array of 80 breast cancer tissue sections in a national external quality assessment program. Laboratory performance was assessed using both the ER standards and the tissue array. Similar to previous studies, the tissue array revealed substantial discrepancies in ER test results among the participating laboratories. The new ER calibrators revealed a broad range of analytic sensitivity, with the lower limits of detection ranging from 7310 to 74 790 molecules of ER. The data demonstrate, for the first time, that the variable test results correlate with analytic sensitivity, which can now be measured quantitatively.

conclusionsThe reference standard enables precise interlaboratory alignment of immunohistochemistry test sensitivity for measuring cellular proteins in situ. The introduction of a reference standard and traceable units of measure for protein expression marks an important milestone.

Indexed as

Receptors, EstrogenFluoresceinsHumansImmunoassayImmunohistochemistryReference StandardsFluoresceinsReceptors, Estrogenfluoresceinimmunohistochemistryin situmicrobeadreference standard

Identifiers

PMID33585916
PMCPMC8085580
OpenAlexW3132270960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.