ArticleACS omega2021
Size-Dependent Penetration of Gold Nanoprobes into Fixed Cells.
Article in ACS omega, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dynamic Polymer Cross-linking Limits the Homogeneity of Compact Quantum Dots for Single-Particle Tracking.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2025Article
- A Permeabilization Workflow To Enable Specific Multiplexed Profiling Using SERS Nanoparticles.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2025Article
- Encapsulation of Nanoparticles with Statistical Copolymers with Different Surface Charges and Analysis of Their Interactions with Proteins and Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Nano-bio-interface: Unleashing the Potential of Noble Nanometals.Small science · 2024Article
- Induction of toxicity in human colon cells and organoids by size- and composition-dependent road dust.RSC advances · 2023Article
- Insight on Mercapto-Coumarins: Synthesis and Reactivity.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nanoprobes have been increasingly applied in the biomedical field due to their superior optical, electronic, or magnetic properties. Among the many aspects involved in the interaction between nanoprobes and biospecimens, size plays an essential role. Although the influence of size on their internalization behavior and distribution in live cells has been extensively studied, how does the size affect penetration of nanoprobes into fixed cells remains unknown. We investigate here the influence of size on the penetration behavior of gold nanoprobes into fixed mammalian cells by dark-field microscopy and surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) microspectroscopy. We show that 14, 20, and 29 nm nanoprobes can readily enter into methanol-fixed MCF-7 cells, while 42 and 55 nm nanoprobes cannot cross the cell membrane. For 4% paraformaldehyde-fixed cells, even 14 nm nanoprobes can hardly get into the cells, but after treatment with permeabilization reagents, 14 and 20 nm nanoprobes are permitted to enter the cells. These findings provide important implications in future design of nanoprobes for cellular immunostaining.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.