Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33585723›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2021

Effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation therapy on physical function in patients with COVID-19 associated pneumonia: Study protocol of a randomized controlled trial.

Marco A Minetto, Sabrina Dal Fior, Chiara Busso, Pietro Caironi, Giuseppe Massazza, Nicola A Maffiuletti, Federica Gamna

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Marco A MinettoDivision of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Sabrina Dal FiorDivision of Physical Medicine and NeuroRehabilitation, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano, Italy.
Chiara BussoDivision of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Pietro CaironiDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care, San Luigi Hospital, Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Giuseppe MassazzaDivision of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Nicola A MaffiulettiHuman Performance Lab, Schulthess Clinic, Zurich, Switzerland.
Federica GamnaDivision of Physical Medicine and NeuroRehabilitation, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano, Italy.
University of Turin · ITOspedale San Luigi Gonzaga · ITSchulthess-Klinik · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeNeuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) has been considered as a promising approach for the early rehabilitation of patients during and/or after intensive care unit (ICU) stay. The overall objective of this study is to evaluate the NMES effectiveness to counteract the post-ICU impairment in physical function of COVID-19 patients. The specific aim of this manuscript is to describe the study design, protocol, content of interventions, primary and secondary outcomes and to discuss the clinical rehabilitation impact of the expected experimental results.

methodsThis prospective, randomized, controlled, parallel-group, single-blind trial will include 80 patients who had undergone mechanical or non-invasive ventilation following pneumonia-induced respiratory failure. Patients are randomized to a control group (routine physical therapy for 3 weeks) or a NMES group (routine physical therapy plus NMES of quadriceps and gastrocnemius muscles for 3 weeks). The primary outcome is physical performance assessed through the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB). Secondary outcomes include independence level, perceived fatigue, muscle strength, rectus femoris thickness, and walking performance. The SPBB and walking performance are assessed once (after the intervention), while all other outcomes are assessed twice (before and after the intervention).

conclusionNMES is a simple and non-invasive technique for muscle strengthening that is usually well tolerated, does not produce adverse effects, requires no or little cooperation from patients and is quite inexpensive. Therefore, proving the effectiveness of NMES therapy for physical and muscle function in COVID-19 patients could support its systematic incorporation in post-ICU rehabilitation protocols of patients presenting with post-intensive care syndrome.

Indexed as

COVID-19FatigueMechanical ventilationMuscle thicknessNeuromuscular electrical stimulationPost-intensive care syndromeQuadriceps muscleShort physical performance battery

Identifiers

PMID33585723
PMCPMC7871886
OpenAlexW3128552227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.