Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33585602›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2020

Reducing Antimicrobial Usage in Small-Scale Chicken Farms in Vietnam: A 3-Year Intervention Study.

Doan Hoang Phu, Nguyen Van Cuong, Dinh Bao Truong, Bach Tuan Kiet, Vo Be Hien, Ho Thi Viet Thu, Lam Kim Yen, Nguyen Thi Tuyet Minh, Pawin Padungtod, Erry Setyawan and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Doan Hoang PhuOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Nguyen Van CuongOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Dinh Bao TruongOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Bach Tuan KietSub-Department of Animal Health and Production, Cao Lãnh City, Vietnam.
Vo Be HienSub-Department of Animal Health and Production, Cao Lãnh City, Vietnam.
Ho Thi Viet ThuDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Can Tho University, Can Tho, Vietnam.
Lam Kim YenFaculty of Agriculture and Aquaculture, Dong Thap Community College, Cao Lãnh City, Vietnam.
Nguyen Thi Tuyet MinhFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Pawin PadungtodFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Erry SetyawanFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Guy ThwaitesOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Jonathan RushtonInstitute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Juan Carrique-MasOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Oxford University Clinical Research Unit · VNNong Lam University Ho Chi Minh City · VNVietnam National University of Agriculture · VNCan Tho University · VNDong Thap University · VNUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Indiscriminate antimicrobial use (AMU) in animal production is a driver of antimicrobial resistance globally. There is a need to define sustainable interventions to reduce AMU in small-scale production systems, which currently represent the most widespread farming systems in South East Asia and many low- and middle-income countries. We conducted a before-and-after intervention study on a random sample of small-scale chicken farms in the Mekong Delta of Vietnam from 2016 to 2019. The study included a baseline followed by an intervention phase where farmers were provided with regular veterinary advice on flock health and husbandry, as well as antimicrobial replacement products. Of 102 recruited farms (raising >100 chickens per flock cycle), thirty-five (34.2%) entered the intervention phase, whilst the rest stopped raising chickens, mainly due to suboptimal flock performance. Through the implementation of our intervention, chicken flocks reduced levels of AMU by 66% [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 0.34;

Indexed as

antimicrobial usediseasepoultrysmallholder farmsVietnam

Identifiers

PMID33585602
PMCPMC7876082
OpenAlexW3125404396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.