Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33585351›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical treatment and research2021

Comparing the short-term outcomes and cost between solo single-incision distal gastrectomy and conventional multiport totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.

Boram Lee, Sang Il Youn, Kanghaeng Lee, Yongjoon Won, Sahong Min, Yoon Taek Lee, Young Suk Park, Sang-Hoon Ahn, Do Joong Park, Hyung-Ho Kim

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical treatment and research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Boram LeeDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1567-1774
Sang Il YounDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4029-8572
Kanghaeng LeeDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0241-2781
Yongjoon WonDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9222-288X
Sahong MinDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6150-7935
Yoon Taek LeeDepartment of Surgery, Ewha Womans University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2643-2007
Young Suk ParkDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6352-9759
Sang-Hoon AhnDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8827-3625
Do Joong ParkDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9644-6127
Hyung-Ho KimDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8916-0048
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital · KRSeoul National University · KREwha Womans University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSingle-incision laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (SIDG) requires experienced camera operators for a stable image. Since it is difficult for skilled camera operators to participate in all SIDG, we began performing solo surgery using mechanical camera holders. We aimed to compare the short-term outcomes and cost between solo SIDG and conventional multiport laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (MLDG) for early gastric cancer (EGC).

methodsFrom January 2014 to December 2016, a total of 938 consecutive patients underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy for EGC. Solo SIDG (n = 99) and MLDG patients (n = 198) were selected and 1:2 propensity score matching was done to compare the quality of operation and cost-effectiveness. All solo SIDG was performed by a surgeon using a camera holder, without any assistant.

resultsMean operation time (120 ± 35.3

conclusionThis study demonstrated that solo SIDG performed by experienced laparoscopic surgeons is safe and feasible for EGC. Solo SIDG is expected to be a promising potential treatment for EGC.

Indexed as

Cost analysisLaparoscopyStomach neoplasmsSurgical wound

Identifiers

PMID33585351
PMCPMC7870426
OpenAlexW3126613914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.