Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33585276›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2020

Oral Microbiome Analysis in Prospective Genome Cohort Studies of the Tohoku Medical Megabank Project.

Sakae Saito, Yuichi Aoki, Toru Tamahara, Maki Goto, Hiroyuki Matsui, Junko Kawashima, Inaho Danjoh, Atsushi Hozawa, Shinichi Kuriyama, Yoichi Suzuki and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Saliva assay: a call for methodological standardization.Journal of periodontal & implant science · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sakae SaitoTohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Yuichi AokiTohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Toru TamaharaTohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Maki GotoTohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Hiroyuki MatsuiTohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Junko KawashimaTohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Inaho DanjohTohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Atsushi HozawaTohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Shinichi KuriyamaTohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Yoichi SuzukiTohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Nobuo FuseTohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Shigeo KureTohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Riu YamashitaTohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Osamu TanabeTohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Naoko MinegishiTohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Kengo KinoshitaTohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Akito TsuboiTohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Ritsuko ShimizuTohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Masayuki YamamotoTohoku Medical Megabank Organization, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Tohoku Medical Megabank Organization · JPTohoku University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A baseline oral microbiome study of the Tohoku Medical Megabank Organization (TMM) was planned to characterize the profile of the oral microbiome in the Japanese population. The study also aimed to clarify risk factors for multifactorial diseases by integrated analysis of the oral microbiome and host genome/omics information. From 2013 to 2016, we collected three types of oral biospecimens, saliva, supragingival plaque, and tongue swab, from a total of 25,101 participants who had a dental examination in TMM. In this study, we used two independent cohorts; the Community-Based Cohort and Birth and Three-Generation Cohort as discovery and validation cohorts, respectively, and we selected participants examined by a single dentist. We found through the 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing analysis of 834 participants of the Community-Based Cohort Study that there are differences in the microbial composition and community structure between saliva and plaque. The species diversities in both saliva and plaque were increased in correlation with the severity of periodontal disease. These results were nicely reproduced in the analysis of 455 participants of the Birth and Three-Generation Cohort Study. In addition, strong positive and negative associations of microbial taxa in both plaque and saliva with periodontitis-associated biofilm formation were detected by co-occurrence network analysis. The classes

Indexed as

MicrobiotaCohort StudiesHumansProspective StudiesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSalivaRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S ribosomal RNAdental plaquemicrobiomeoral healthperiodontal diseaseprospective cohortsaliva

Identifiers

PMID33585276
PMCPMC7878372
OpenAlexW3124533575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.