ArticleFrontiers in oncology2020
A Nomogram Model Involving Immunohistochemical Markers for Predicting the Recurrence of Stage I-II Endometrial Cancer.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Metabolic-Epigenetic Axis of AARS1/IGF2BP3-K280 Lactylation Sustains Endometrial Cancer Stemness and Recurrence.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Article
- Differential expression of estrogen and progesterone receptors before and after surgery in endometrial cancer and analysis of recurrence prediction model.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Nomogram Based on Pan-Immune Inflammation Value and Clinicopathological Parameters for Predicting the Recurrence of Endometrial Cancer and Providing Postoperative Prognostic Management.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Predictive value of IGF2BP2 for endometrial cancer recurrence: a multicenter study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- 2023 FIGO Staging of Endometrial Cancer with Molecular Classification: Dawn and Challenges.Journal of Cancer · 2025Article
- Accurate prediction of the lymph node status in ampullary duodenal carcinoma: potential guidance for clinical management.BMC cancer · 2024Article
- The prognostic value of co-expression of stemness markers CD44 and CD133 in endometrial cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Predicting recurrence of non-muscle invasive bladder urothelial carcinoma: predictive value of the optimal cut-off value of Ki67.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- A Novel Hematological Inflammation-Nutrition Score (HINS) and Its Related Nomogram Model to Predict Survival Outcome in Advanced Gastric Cancer Patients Receiving First-Line Palliative Chemotherapy.Journal of inflammation research · 2023Article
- Consistency of P53 immunohistochemical expression between preoperative biopsy and final surgical specimens of endometrial cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- External validation study of endometrial cancer preoperative risk stratification model (ENDORISK).Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- A Nomogram Model for Predicting Recurrence of Stage I-III Endometrial Cancer Based on Inflammation-Immunity-Nutrition Score (IINS) and Traditional Classical Predictors.Journal of inflammation research · 2022Article
- Analysis of Factors Related to Lymph Node Metastasis in Early-Stage Type 1 Endometrial Cancer: Verifying the Clinical Value of Positive Threshold of the Immunohistochemical Parameter Ki67.Cancer management and research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe purpose of this study was to establish a nomogram combining classical parameters and immunohistochemical markers to predict the recurrence of patients with stage I-II endometrial cancer (EC).
methods419 patients with stage I-II endometrial cancer who received primary surgical treatment at the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University were involved in this study as a training cohort. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis of screening prognostic factors were performed in the training cohort to develop a nomogram model, which was further validated in 248 patients (validation cohort) from the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University. The calibration curve was used for internal and external verification of the model, and the C-index was used for comparison among different models.
resultsThere were 51 recurrent cases in the training cohort while 31 cases in the validation cohort. Univariate analysis showed that age, histological type, histological grade, myometrial invasion, cervical stromal invasion, postoperative adjuvant treatment, and four immunohistochemical makers (Ki67, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, P53) were the related factors for recurrence of EC. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that histological type (P = 0.029), myometrial invasion (P = 0.003), cervical stromal invasion (P = 0.001), Ki67 (P < 0.001), ER (P = 0.009) and P53 expression (P = 0.041) were statistically correlated with recurrence of EC. Recurrence-free survival was better predicted by the proposed nomogram with a C-index of 0.832 (95% CI, 0.752-0.912) in the training cohort, and the validation set confirmed the finding with a C-index of 0.861 (95% CI, 0.755-0.967).
conclusionThe nomogram model combining classical parameters and immunohistochemical markers can better predict the recurrence in patients with FIGO stage I-II EC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.