ArticleCurrent ophthalmology reports2020
MANAGEMENT OF LARGE OR RECURRENT MACULAR HOLES.
Article in Current ophthalmology reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Anatomical and functional outcomes and prognostic factors after idiopathic full-thickness macular hole surgery: a single-center retrospective cohort study.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Corneal stromal lenticule covering technique combined with intraocular tamponade for the treatment of recurrent macular holes and macular hole retinal detachments.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Predicting Visual Recovery in Long-Standing Macular Holes: Surgical Strategies and Role of Optical Coherence Tomography Biomarkers.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025Article
- Large macular hole and autologous retinal transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2024Review
- Relationship between lymphocytes and idiopathic macular hole.BMC ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Surgical classification for large macular hole: based on different surgical techniques results: the CLOSE study group.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2023Article
- Short-Term Clinical Results After ILM Removal and Inverted ILM Flap for Macular Hole Repair - A Single-Center Retrospective Experience.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023Article
- Comparison of three techniques of harvesting full-thickness retinal tissue for large or persistent macular holes.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2022Article
- Commentary: Macular hole surgery - A tweak here and there.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewTo review and critically appraise the recent literature about new surgical techniques for the management of large or recurrent macular holes. RECENT
findingsA variety of surgical approaches have recently been developed ranging from autologous retinal grafts to amniotic membrane transplant with varying levels of anatomical and visual success. SUMMARY: More data is needed to determine if one technique is superior to others. However, with a variety of grafts, adhesives, and tamponades at their disposal, vitreoretinal surgeons have an extensive array of options to approach complex macular holes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.