ArticleCurrent physical medicine and rehabilitation reports2020
Cerebellar Neuromodulation for Stroke.
Article in Current physical medicine and rehabilitation reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deep cerebellar stimulation restores chronic motor deficits and loss of GABAergic neurons following sensorimotor cortex surgical brain injury in female rats.Experimental neurology · 2026Article
- Article
- Post-trial access to implantable neural devices: an exploratory international survey.BMJ surgery, interventions, & health technologies · 2024Article
- Low-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Neuromodulation for Stroke Recovery: A Novel Deep Brain Stimulation Approach for Neurorehabilitation?IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology · 2023Article
- Modulation of neural co-firing to enhance network transmission and improve motor function after stroke.Neuron · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewThis paper reviews the current preclinical and clinical evidence for cerebellar deep brain stimulation for stroke rehabilitation. RECENT
findingsWe have demonstrated the effectiveness of cerebellar stimulation for stroke rehabilitation in rodent models, which has been reproduced by other groups. Synaptogenesis, neurogenesis, and vicariation of function in the perilesional cortex likely contribute to the mechanistic underpinnings of the effectiveness of this therapy. A Phase I clinical trial investigating dentate nucleus stimulation for improvement of hemiparesis due to stroke is currently underway, and results thus far are encouraging. SUMMARY: Activation of the rodent cerebellar dentate nucleus promotes functional motor recovery following stroke. Although results of a Phase I clinical trial are pending, substantial preclinical evidence indicates that deep brain stimulation of the dentate nucleus is a promising therapeutic modality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.