ReviewFrontiers in genetics2020
Emerging Technologies for Genome-Wide Profiling of DNA Breakage.
Review in Frontiers in genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- The breakome of BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathway mutation carriers reveals early processes in breast oncogenesis.Cell death & disease · 2025Article
- Quantitative Analysis of DNA Double-Strand Breaks in Genomic DNA Using Standard Curve Method.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2025Article
- DNA double-stranded breaks, a hallmark of aging, defined at the nucleotide resolution, are increased and associated with transcription in the cardiac myocytes in LMNA-cardiomyopathy.Cardiovascular research · 2025Article
- Uncovering the dynamics of precise repair at CRISPR/Cas9-induced double-strand breaks.Nature communications · 2024Article
- S-phase checkpoint prevents leading strand degradation from strand-associated nicks at stalled replication forks.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
- Common occurrence of hotspots of single strand DNA breaks at transcriptional start sites.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Navigating the pitfalls of mapping DNA and RNA modifications.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2023Review
- Complex genomic patterns of abasic sites in mammalian DNA revealed by a high-resolution SSiNGLe-AP method.Nature communications · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Genome instability is associated with myriad human diseases and is a well-known feature of both cancer and neurodegenerative disease. Until recently, the ability to assess DNA damage-the principal driver of genome instability-was limited to relatively imprecise methods or restricted to studying predefined genomic regions. Recently, new techniques for detecting DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) and single strand breaks (SSBs) with next-generation sequencing on a genome-wide scale with single nucleotide resolution have emerged. With these new tools, efforts are underway to define the "breakome" in normal aging and disease. Here, we compare the relative strengths and weaknesses of these technologies and their potential application to studying neurodegenerative diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.