Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33584668›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology

Induction of SARS-CoV-2 Protein S-Specific CD8+ T Cells in the Lungs of gp96-Ig-S Vaccinated Mice.

Eva Fisher, Laura Padula, Kristin Podack, Katelyn O'Neill, Matthew M Seavey, Padmini Jayaraman, Rahul Jasuja, Natasa Strbo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. γδ T cells in oral diseases.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Eva FisherDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, United States.
Laura PadulaDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, United States.
Kristin PodackDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, United States.
Katelyn O'NeillDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, United States.
Matthew M SeaveyHeat Biologics, Inc., Morrisville, NC, United States.
Padmini JayaramanHeat Biologics, Inc., Morrisville, NC, United States.
Rahul JasujaHeat Biologics, Inc., Morrisville, NC, United States.
Natasa StrboDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, United States.
University of Miami · USHeat Biologics (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Given the aggressive spread of COVID-19-related deaths, there is an urgent public health need to support the development of vaccine candidates to rapidly improve the available control measures against SARS-CoV-2. To meet this need, we are leveraging our existing vaccine platform to target SARS-CoV-2. Here, we generated cellular heat shock chaperone protein, glycoprotein 96 (gp96), to deliver SARS-CoV-2 protein S (spike) to the immune system and to induce cell-mediated immune responses. We showed that our vaccine platform effectively stimulates a robust cellular immune response against protein S. Moreover, we confirmed that gp96-Ig, secreted from allogeneic cells expressing full-length protein S, generates powerful, protein S polyepitope-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses in both lung interstitium and airways. These findings were further strengthened by the observation that protein-S -specific CD8+ T cells were induced in human leukocyte antigen HLA-A2.1 transgenic mice thus providing encouraging translational data that the vaccine is likely to work in humans, in the context of SARS-CoV-2 antigen presentation.

Indexed as

AnimalsCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCOVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesGenetic VectorsHumansImmunoglobulin GLungMembrane GlycoproteinsMiceMice, Inbred C57BLRecombinant Fusion ProteinsSARS-CoV-2Spike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusCOVID-19 VaccinesendoplasminImmunoglobulin GMembrane GlycoproteinsRecombinant Fusion ProteinsSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2CD8+ T cellsCOVID-19glycoprotein 96heat shock proteinlungsSARS-CoV-2 protein Svaccine

Identifiers

PMID33584668
PMCPMC7873992
OpenAlexW3124251308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.